2020: Wearing a mask is a choice! You can wear a mask if you like; but you can’t make me wear one.

2024: I cannot be forced to sit next to someone wearing a mask! You wearing a mask is an attack on me!

He seems to be implying that if the person was wearing a mask, they must have a communicable disease and so he felt unsafe sitting next to them. He himself seems bound and determined to make himself as susceptible to communicable diseases as he possibly can and assumes it is everybody else’s responsibility to keep him…

There’s a weird conservative tendency to think they are being attacked by simply being in a presence of someone who they assume has more liberal values than they do.

I am really, REALLY curious how someone else wearing a mask affects him.

“I refuse to sit next to someone who is considerate enough to wear a mask in public.  I mean, what kind of twisted freak tries to limit the spread of contagions to others?  Who does that?”

Anyone that is that insistent that they aren’t drunk is absolutely drunk. In other news, what an utter child. 

We’re one step closer to a big-budget thriller about urban planning.

Does any long standing Stardew player have any problem with not having enough funds? As soon as I was able to make Ancient Fruit wine and just have a greenhouse full of them growing all year round, I never wanted for money ever again!

Fake sanctimony, bigotry and dry overrated garbage.

The only conceivable reason for this is that it’s going to be a tracked achievement where the data is collected over time so we can round up the monsters who voluntarily choose to drink mayonnaise.

which has endured after a years-long drought of little to no content

wait, wait wait, before i laugh at you...

Kotaku has paid Geoff Keighley quite a bit for freelance work in the past, yet I see no mention of it here in this article where Kotaku claims some kind of superiority over this man who they contracted with. Does Kotaku treat all its former freelancers this way? Will Kotaku issue an apology for having worked with this…

I’m confused as to why people seem to think Keighley should be an activist. His shows are and have always been marketing shows. The only time he’s ever mentioned a publisher in a negative light was Konami and that was only after it essentially left the gaming industry and was no longer relevant.

Seriously. Social apps and platforms have changed pretty often at least as long as I’ve been using it, and I started in 1990. People will go somewhere else if it’s banned.

Without sounding like a millennial with a lawn complex (fat chance), from years of experience, this is not the impending apocalypse zoomers...

Some other company will fill the void, you’ll move to it and forget that TikTok ever existed. The same thing happens with every social media product that was the “big thing” for some period of time.

Yeah.  This guy gets it. It's less a tiktok ban and more a force of ownership change. Nothing is likely to change

Gaming communities will survive - thrive, even - without TikTok. Get a grip.

Wasn’t Kotaku part of the crowed calling TikTok Chinese spyware back when it first came out. Is that no longer the party line?