mmm24
MamaMia
mmm24

You are an angry soul. “Doing something right” doesn’t mean, “doing something correctly in the wider view of contribution to human evolution and meaning,” but rather, “doing something correctly in terms of bringing in a significant income.”

Maybe check that derision for your fellow human beings at the goddamn door, you

Let’s be brutally honest...

Cars are designed to be driven, knives are tools that can be used for many purposes and guns are designed specifically to kill. How does your argument work again?

Ahhh, the dumbest argument ever sure is a classic.

thats one of those “old timey parts that doesnt apply” like wearing blended clothing, and stoning adulterers. Makes it real easy to win arguments when you get to decide unilaterally which arguments are valid.

You do realize there is a vast spectrum between all guns and no guns, right? There’s a reason we don’t let you arm yourself with nuclear weapons, dumbass.

Cars require training, testing, licensing, registration, and insurance for people to purchase them

Do you show equal anger over attempted suppression of the first amendment like attempts to force muslims to be part of a national registry, or arresting peaceful protestors?

1) No right is absolute

Although a document written hundreds of years ago when people had single-fire muskets couldn’t possibly predict assault weapons in the hands of every citizen. Also, what happened to the “well regulated” part?

Dial it back a bit, Gandalf.

I think his point there, based on the context of the thing, was that he got the eviction notice before getting any sort of warning (which should have come before the notice obviously), and suspects it was because of prejudice. He’s not as much boasting about it as disgusted that this probably happens to other people,

It has nothing to do with offense so much as a frustrating and boring character. The entire plot for the third game was driven by his assholishness - it all could have gone differently if he had sacrificed himself to save his family in the second game. Instead you got him constantly burning bridges in the third game

is it x

I would imagine that most people currently in favour of quotas would be in favour of blind hiring if they knew the statistics; unfortunately, there is also push-back from companies themselves. They want to be able to choose employees based on qualities other than those directly related to work, and in that case a

I can’t wait for the day when people can have an opinion like this and not be forced to apologize.

You want equality? Start blind-hiring. But of course, most people don’t want that, because then any sort of gender/race imbalance will actually reflect truth, and nobody will have anything left to complain about to make themselves feel morally superior!

Did you ever stop to think that maybe the perceived difference between genders (or race) is more a result of environment than inherent differences. Traditional gender and race roles are still very much a thing in society, and that’s not a product of the way you were born. That’s a structure and way of thinking that is

It’s how to catch up. A lot of great candidates have been passed over for years due to either their ethnicity or sex. Now they’re getting a fair shot. Again, this isn’t a case of not hiring the best person, these people are suitable for these roles, just in the past, they wouldn’t get the chance.

The apology is proportional to the audience. If YOU say some shit like a pair of boobs gets in the way of filming fantasy and someone calls you out on it, and you reflect and decide that yeah, that shit is ignorant, wouldn’t you want to apologize to the person who called you out? This person said this to thousands,