I would wager that could only be accounting for mainstream productions. I mean come on, the last 30 years gave us the meteoric rise of the independent film movement and following that the proliferation of inexpensive digital filmmaking/music recording capabilities and the tools to disseminate them without the previous…

I think we're talking about different members of the same generations. There are plenty of people from older generations that didn't create a damn thing themselves but will be happy to rant at you about how much better things were in the days of yore.

80's and 90's artists tend to be the highest grossing tours, Rolling Stones aside, but the point stands.

To be fair, neither The X-Files nor Twin Peaks stuck the landing, if these revivals fail to improve on the previous endings it won't hurt the standing of the highs they both achieved.

The Deadline story shows how this was a long time in the making with Fox. Twin Peaks was and is a cult show, it's cult audience has grown but it's still a small portion of the following The X-Files had, 24 was a much bigger hit than Twin Peaks as well and is the living example of this idea working, the hint of another…

Their motives are the same as they were when the show was greenlit, to make money. If the crew have the motivation to stick the landing better than they did the first time around and Fox's desire for cash provides them with the opportunity to do so, so be it.

They're being brought back for capitalistic reasons, to recreate profits, not childhoods. It's not about entitled 90's kids, and yeah, I'm with those that point out that the majority of that show's audience was born in the several decades preceding the 90's.

As stupid as that is, it's only a small subset of people behaving that way and engaging with that. The constant "this generation is immature and stuck in the past" thing is an annoying generalization.

True, but it'll be nice for such a great show to have a chance at at the denouement it actually deserved, rather than petering out.

This keeps getting said, and yet, we're in a day and age where there's basically too much quality programming to keep up with thanks to cable/streaming. This isn't really competing with new series given the plethora of other things and its short run time. It's more like hitting a home run off of a tee to help fund…

The image of her scuttling back under the bed has always made me laugh out loud though, for all the episode's nasty trappings.

Both were good and bad, early on they were both good, from season 5 on pretty much only MOTW episodes were good. But that doesn't mean there weren't plenty of MOTW's throughout the run that were only saved by virtue of Anderson and Duchovny.

There is absolutely no defensible reason for making this film.

Much as I loved him on SNL, I'm with you on his movie persona. But for the random things he does outside of movies, I'm still a fan. He showed up on The Tonight Show the other night as Little Debbie, that was pretty left-field hilarious. Besides, he'll always get a pass for a number of bad movies for his turn in…

He showed up on The Tonight Show the other night as Little Debbie, that was pretty left-field hilarious. Honestly, I loved him on SNL, I've rarely enjoyed his movies though. But for the random things he does outside of movies, I'm still a fan. Besides, he'll always get a pass for a number of bad movies for his turn in…

Will all those who buy tickets for it be indicted as codefendants?

It's clear she only did the other two because they signed her as an up-and-comer before all the end of year awards for Winter's Bone and just before carrying The Hunger Games. Hence why Mystique is so much more prominent in Days of Future Past, Fox was capitalizing on a low cost asset.

To be fair, he's so terse that he's practically writing screenplays without the formatting half the time anyway.

Bland?

The rest of the MCU seems to be doing what a lot of us are, living like Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. never happened.