mjlowe--disqus
mjlowe
mjlowe--disqus

Yeah those are basically on an annual cycle of theatrically releasing what should be straight to video knockoffs. I can't believe Lassetter OK'ed that. Most people aren't savvy enough to realize it's Disney tarnishing Pixar by association, not the studio themselves. Hell, Disney was able to get Pixar to agree to the

Look several years ago I always said The Incredibles was the only Pixar film that could spawn an artistically successful sequel. Then we started getting inundated with Pixar sequels after the Disney buyout. With Bird on board I'm sure it can be great, but I'm definitely not excited like I would have been 5+ years ago.

Somehow they already broke the trilogy problem by not having the 3rd one fall off a cliff quality-wise, I'm not in favor of this, but who knows what they can pull off.

Thanks for that, I was worried after the first few minutes without it!

I still need to get around to seeing Walls A through D at some point.

Don't forget Finding Dory and The Incredibles 2! You get a sequel! And you get a sequel!

Boo.

Now I'm left with the image of Chewie in pieces with wires coming out of his torso like 3P0 in Empire Strikes Back.

Even though if you think about it, it kind of is.

Windu's quote kind of brilliantly retcons the limitations of what they showed in the OT as well, if the title hints at the future Jedi tapping into a stronger Force we could have our justification for some Force Unleashed level shit. Then again that game being considered canon messes up the idea that things were still

It also makes it look like they're dropping Episode VII from the title.

Now, now. Let's not say things we can't take back.

Nailed is so much more bothersome since 90% of that movie was shot before being shelved forever.

As a goofy movie set in a town full of weirdos, that still have rather
specific but still understandable fears and struggles, it still works
for me. As anything but satire it fell apart basically the second time I
watched it, but I watch it almost every year still because of how
quotable and oddball it is.

The second generation Radiohead evangelicals that jumped on with In Rainbows (and thus consider Radiohead to be indie heroes, completely oblivious to or ignoring the fact that the only reason that made an impact was because they had been a darling of EMI, one of the largest labels in the world, for 15 years) are even

I love Donnie Darko because it takes place in a town full of weirdos, and the dialog/performances are really funny. As anything serious or science fiction it falls apart completely but it's one of the most quotable movies. Plus I love how the gym teacher tries to censor my favorite author of all time.

He can punch up dialog though, honestly the dialog and weirdo characters are what endeared Donnie Darko to me, not the supposed mindfuckery.

Ugh, or every posing "indie" artist on The Voice. In fact, just last week a kid did this very song, basically just ran with Jules' version and added more lilting runs to his vocal and everyone fawned over how stunningly different it was. It drives me nuts. Apparently the judges on American Idol once fawned over

You can highlight something as cheesy and still like it, I love 80's pop and yet a ton of it certainly is cheesy.

You're also talking in gross generalizations. You're also accusing people of using words to convey something they don't actually understand and then drop meaningless buzzwords like "post-ironic". But to be fair, a lot of people above a certain age act the same way you're saying towards recent music, at most they can