Nobody’s stopping anyone from supporting left wing ideas.

Riiiiight. Not to pander to anti-vax voters.

You think “internet debates” is a thing. All I need to know.

It’s like talking to a guy who was voted the King of Internet Burns, 1997.

Also, adverbs are for losers.

Same - I had nine Drowzees on my location screen this morning.

Sorry, I missed this: You’re a proofreader? Like, that’s your entire job? You spend however many hours a day (in between Ultimate Frisbee games) nitpicking mistakes the work of actual writers?

I apologize for everything I said. The fact that you haven’t yet firebombed a 7-11 means that you have more mental fortitude…

Thankfully, my elitist profession includes credentialing, so you and your free-thinking, comic-book-character-proofing brethren will have stay outside the gates.

I’ve covered for a lot of self-entitled special snowflakes over the years. Now I try to help my people avoid that same aggravation.

And you misused “considerable.”

I’m starting to understand why you were out of work for two years.

When you can find someone who wants YOUR job, why in the world would you ever hire someone who just wants A job?

As a manager, I’m not going to sacrifice my team’s productivity and sanity, as well as my own extra hours, on a revolving door. In my experience, the “hardest working, most grateful, and loyal employees”…

The interviewer doesn’t work for the job candidate. Honestly, she owes him nothing more than attention and fair consideration. She has no obligation to “show them a better, more supportive experience.”

Glad you found a good job, and also that you were able to hold out for it, as opposed to taking A JOB that you’d hate…

Successful people focus on what THEY can control, and always look for how THEY can make a difference. They understand that focusing on others’ faults (other than asking “how can I help?”) is a waste of time.

Interviewers should absolutely probe for whether the candidate has this type of thinking. It’s not about whether…

Gaudy.

You don’t read good. The article was not a hypothetical, they were specific real world experiences he had.

Play that out. The opposing side wants to use the text as evidence. Can you tell the judge the same lie?

Did your law school teach you to ignore footnotes as well as professional conduct rules? Because this is the one attached to the hypothetical you cited — the author answers the question “yes”:

Reading that quote from Justice Blackmon got me thinking: It’s been 45 years, and we still need affirmative action. Does that mean it hasn’t worked? Or are we just not up the hill yet?

In states where property taxes fund schools:

Higher property values = more property taxes.

Read up on inadvertent disclosure. It’s fixable.

So your solution to a (fixable) mistake is to violate Rule 4.1.

No, I guess I don’t understand your perspective on this situation.