I’m late, in the greys and this will probably never be seen but I’m gonna post it anyways.

I do get that, but that's all the more reason that they shouldn't be trying to sell essentially the same game as 2 different games. Some people still do buy both and it's kinda gross. 

To the “illiterate fuckface” in the greys, you’re trying to defend a site who’s promoting games for a company that they know is defending sexual abusers. That’s called having your cake and eating it too. It’s not good enough, and it’s especially not good enough throwing it a ways down a god awful home page that nobody…

Anyone else get a little irritated seeing pokemon sword/shield listed as a single game while Nintendo continues to sell these as 2 separate full price games?

Fuck it. I’m just going to copy and paste this in all these articles that are promoting Ubisoft games unless they start mentioning it themselves.

Reminder that this is a Ubisoft game. Another game company that covers up the sexual abuse by the people it chooses to leave in power. This type of article doesn’t exactly give me confidence that Kotaku won’t do the same thing for Blizzard when they drop their next big game.

Shit may float but if you leave it long enough it starts to fall apart and sink which, I hope, is what we're witnessing right now. 

Right but....that’s what I said?

Seems par for the course for a game published by Gearbox I'd say. 

Yikes, I was getting ads for this game and I was going to look at it. After the above review mentioning having the worst parts of a survival game and lacking permanent upgrades I was disappointed. Seeing the words “battle pass” I was questioning if this was a f2p game but it’s not. It even looks to have f2p bullshit…

Yeah, that's a fucking problem I don't think blizzard has the balls to fix. 

That video is more cringe than the Diablo immortals “what, don’t you have phones?” What’s equally bad is these are the shit developers we create when there are so many people booing this woman’s question. Just once I’d love to see the next person in line go "yeah, this isn't my original question but I'm going to ask…

There aren’t nearly enough people who care about this sort of shit. How often do you hear people still talk about how the upper upper management at ubisoft covered up for sexual abusers? Not here at Kotaku, where they love to post about ubisoft games. What about riot games? This seems like just a bigger scale riot…

I’m also curious. I thought they were just referring to more interactive choose your own adventure stories like that black mirror thing or the minecraft thing.

No worries. I think the same thing every time I see a sneaker post on kotaku. I just realized how much it felt like those posters.

Oh God. Is this how it feels to be those people who always comment that they "don't understand twitch" on every single article about a streamer?

I don't understand these types of collectors markets. It kind of reminds me of that whole "I started with a paperclip and traded up to a house" except the inverse. These people take something that cost relatively little(like the paperclip) and then throw fucking house money at it, then use the house they just gave…

You know, a few years ago I helped someone move. Everyone helping were bird people and this woman had about 30 conures, a few cockatiels, 2 macaws and a Grey. They are all better cared for than 90% of parrot owners treat theirs. Unfortunately one of the carriers that was being borrowed dropped and the lock on the door…

The problem with the argument that he’s donated more to LGBTQIA+ groups than to Republicans is that the Republicans have the power to make powerful policy changes that affect an entire country while at the same time putting tremendous pressure on the charities.