“Saudi Arabia can also sustain supply even to extremely low price level” -
“Saudi Arabia can also sustain supply even to extremely low price level” -
what way? not your way? making “sensible” arguments\questions? Well, I’m not a ‘murican or a sheep. But I guess anyone in “your world” that doesn’t agree with your opinion is a “<enter name> bot”. How typical..... :D
“during the Ukrainian invasion” - it’s strange that not even NATO’s 24\7 surveillance of the Ukrainian border ever saw any invasion.
GLONASS works just fine, no worse than GPS.
“hypocrisy knows no bounds.” - indeed american hypocrisy has no bounds.
“Russia’s dumb bombing campaign “ - ah yes, those damn dumb bombs that never hit anything :D
“Adolph Hitler was the legitimate ruler of Germany. Oddly enough, at some point his “behavior” led us to remove him from his position as well.” - Hitler attacked half of the Europe. If he had not started the war, then nobody would have removed him.
How is it going with Libya?
“Once again, Ufimtsev didn’t design any aircraft.” - where did I state that Ufimtsev designed any aircraft?
the kool-aid remark was meant for your definition of 5th gen fighter, namely that it’s about software
Ufimtsev developed equations for predicting the reflection of electromagnetic waves.
“Especially when you figure that we need extremely advanced software to even come up with effective stealth shapes.” - Ufimtsev didn’t need any advanced software.
so basically it’s all about software :D
“The PAK-FA is not a true fifth generation fighter.” - what is the definition of a 5th gen fighter?
yes, made in Mosfilm :D
“high altitude carpet bombing” - I never thought 5-6K meters was considered as “high altitude”.
Turkey made a cheap provocation and immediately run to the NATO office in some high hopes to get a NATO vs Russia escalation in Syria (but it didn’t happen :D
“They’d ultimately lose, but not before wrecking a good portion of Russia’s military capabilities/equipment.” - and where exactly would it happen? Or do you suggest that Russian assets in Syria are a good portion of Russia’s military capabilities/equipment and it would take decades to rebuild those losses?
“the Chinese flat out copying it!” that is the intention, because the Chinese will have to buy engines anyway. And with more copies they make, more engines they will buy :D
“When they claim increased Russian sub activity in the North Atlantic I’m assuming these subs are being tracked by other subs” - satellite images of the docks provide that information