missscottssunlamp
Group Capt. Mandrake
missscottssunlamp

I have a serious hatred of tights/stockings exactly because as a small child in the 80s I was stuffed into those itchy, awful, horrible things for every concert, wedding, sunday church service. And it is horrible and makes for crabby children.

I am definitely of the camp that this progression started the minute they made Harry march through London behind his mother’s casket. The palace can reap what they sowed. Harry was out no matter what, and they are extra spectacularly mad that the person that pushed it over the edge is an American woman with a mixed

So if you want to know the type of stuff that really bothers me about Meghan, this is it. I guess it’s all heresay, but it kind of checks out.

I was very happy to hear about the wig situation, because that hair was confusing me SO MUCH! I wanted a citation of the year of that picture because that is some 80s-ass hair, very on brand Peggy Noonan, Phyllis Schlafly, Nancy Reagan, Tammy Faye.

It would be an interesting exercise to measure and quantifiably compare the number of words the Times and other British rags have devoted to Meghan and how much devoted to Prince Andrew, who raped child slaves.

As if Meghan requested to wear the those special earrings “You know, the ones that the saudi murderer gifted us”.

And this ridiculousness is why the monarchy isn't long for this world. Who gives a shit about flower girls wearing tights? 

I have a theory regarding Meghan’s so-called “bullying” of the staff: Meghan had and showed them boundaries.

Oh, so THAT’S why her hair is so voluminous: it’s full of secrets AND it’s a wig!

I like that this is all happening when The Crown just reminded us how awful Charles and the firm were to Diana. Definitely makes it easier to root for Harry and Meghan.

I have a duty to my parents too, but I don't expense my dad's diabetic strips to my small purchase account at work, you know?

“Fearless against the wind” makes about as much sense as titling it “Brave in the face of a slight incline.” 

Watching the 1994 Madonna interview with fresh eyes is fascinating. She completely turned the tables on him and proved her point about his “obsession” with her sex life. Yet consensus at the time was that she was the one who made herself look terrible, not the bully she was calling out.

This is how I will easily take any woman’s words over Cuomo’s: his look of satisfaction in response to her look of horror. He gets off on flexing his power over women.

And that’s at a right wing evangelist school where nothing is too extreme.

Wow. Just...wow. 

Patrick Henry College like all Evangelical colleges is both a wingnut welfare finishing school and a haven for sexual predators. Not surprised anyone coming out of there and in politics is a miscreant.  

Is he white? Yup. Are women saying he’s a hot cripple (check twitter)? Yes. Is he conservative?

Man, take a look at that picture. Other issues aside, he’s pretty much the Platonic ideal of a date rapist.

🤮🤢 I’ll only be surprised if this actually impacts his career in any meaningful way.