So who made you the arbiter of video game prices? I might think a game is worth two pieces of lint.

By that logic, we should abolish the police/military and let everyone defend themselves. Personal responsibility!

Good things there are already laws barring these types of practices.

Seeing as I didn’t say what that item was, you’re obviously someone who only uses 10% of your brain.

And a lot of people are willing to pay $60 if they’re told its at a 99% discount.

You’re assuming humans are emotionless/purely logical, perfectly informed beings.

Then you wouldn’t mind if everything was on sale for $60?

So if I priced a candy bar at $100.00 and then claimed a “99% off!” sale and I did that for EVERYTHING in a store, would consider that to be legitimate?

I might be recalling incorrectly, but I believe Mass Effect 1 and 2 (never played 3) had exactly that.

If its a really good movie, yeah.

Because “glitches” are relative.

Splatoon had a demo (a VERY limited demo no less) and it sold just fine.

Don’t worry, I’m sure that will be rectified soon.

I’m not trying to create an argument, I’m just pointing out the fact that the joke only makes sense if you subscribe to the whole “NINTENDO! GRRR!”-philosophy.

Soooo.... no difference at all?

And thats not Nintendo’s fault either. What do you want Nintendo to do? Ban scalpers from buying amiibos?

“told”? Contra told you anything?

Which modern standards? CoD-style one shot to the head is an insta-kill? Not even STALKER did that and that was considered to be among the more hardcore open world shooting games.

Haven’t you heard? The Wii U is dead! Its not like its a legacy system like the Vita.

Sure, but thats not saying much. By that logic, I can find someone who was born pre-NES era who thinks CoD is the hardest game they’ve ever played which would debunk claims that CoD is “casual”.