It certainly didn’t hurt. I think it’s more along the lines of resources, experience, financial health and, perhaps crucially, not being desperate for attention or rushing to be first :)
It certainly didn’t hurt. I think it’s more along the lines of resources, experience, financial health and, perhaps crucially, not being desperate for attention or rushing to be first :)
:) Can’t quite put my finger on it but I have more faith in Audi than I do in Tesla Motors when it comes to driver’s assistance tools.
I understand. It sounds like it either hasn’t been mapped properly or the GPS is not accurate.
The option of reading signs sounds like less reliable option to me as it can go wrong due to speed or poor visibility.
Great. I assume Tesla Motors’ system is not following the same approach hence your original post (obscure sign).
This is a typical “carrot on a stick”. Company is facing product delays and cash crunch. What better time to trot out a shiny new product they are working on (a la Theranos) to get everyone distracted from problems and raise more money.
One way to address this is to add speed limits to maps. System can then adjust if necessary (ex. inclement weather, insufficient readings from other sensors etc.).
As an added bonus, this can feed into “Autopilot” and prevent driver from setting up speed that is higher than allowed perhaps with some buffer (ex. 5 mph).…
To me it looks like Kia or Hyundai. The only reason anyone should entertain this proposition over either is its affiliation with Volvo and its record for safety (pending crash test results).
“Never once had to buy an air freshener to cover up decomposing food.”
My family is on a fairly healthy diet so visits to drive-through of any kind are not often. Even then any food crumbs are picked up and disposed of when exiting the car. You would do the same after eating in the house and I see no reason to be any…
Even then surely it must be unsatisfactory for a man as SMART as Ron Dennis is :)
“They’re in a lull yeah, but that happens.”
The last Constructors’ Title was in 1998. The one before that in 1991.
sar·casm
Ok. A typical Ferrari owner doesn’t have practicality (your second paragraph) nowhere near the top of its priority list. Furthermore, he is able to afford another one (or two) vehicles out of the luxury category that can fulfill daily driving duties (assuming no chauffeur).
What Ferrari can potentially look into moving…
I understood your point.
Mine was that if someone is going to make a statement like that (many find it repulsive) odds are he/she is not capable of understanding what you have explained otherwise he/she wouldn’t make such statement in the first place.
A unicorn will appear at the factory and sprinkle some of that magic dust.
“Granted, the Ferrari may increase in value, but that’s the only thing it’s got going for it over Tesla.”
This might sound like a strange questions but have you ever drove a Ferrari let alone one with V12?
“It’ll probably be a similar experience, just not as quick.”
Thats only one aspect. Shorter wheel base, interior space, cargo area, lesser materials, likely poor fit&finish etc.
Don’t bother. Looks are an abstract category but for anyone to proclaim “many find it repulsive (to look at)“ only shows their lack of intelligence.
“Ballaban” and “cringe” in the same sentence? Now I’ve heard everything!
Outside traditional Ferrari colors that Grigio (and its variants) suits car the best.
Be quiet. This right here (AM-RB 001) is a car engineered in Great Britain therefore it is AMAZING and REVOLUTIONARY. No other nation outside english or german speaking area could possibly be able to put together something like it.