That is covered

I bet he runs over Sean Bean

The Maxima is the best all around car ever made. back in 97-99. And second is the 92-94 Maxima SE.

dude. I am done talking about it. I have given many examples, quoted actual articles, and still you argue with me. either you work for Mclaren and therefore must tow the company line on the fact that they have many cars and options, or you are just to set in your ways to see how another persons opinion, while based in…

Monocell1 or 2 are no different then the 1979 fox body or a 1993 mustang. It’s a PLATFORM, and while they may have slight differences, they are no different then any car you could choose from the Fox bodies. Why else do auto writers talk about how the DB11 is the first to use new platform replace the aging—albeit…

in the future, we in the industry (auto body and insurance) use NADA. Been in the biz for 12 years, and only used kbb until someone told me I was doing it wrong. Nada is more accurate if you are wanting market based values.

stop it

I assume you are counting the F1 amongst mclaren chassis? I only ask this because calling MonoCell 2 a new chassis instead of a variation on Monocell 1 is like calling the VH chassis for Aston Martin different amongst their cars. it’s the same, always has been. Yeah, perhaps they reinforce something for a drop top, or…

and that’s my point... the haven’t done “all the cars” they’ve done ONE car... ONE CHASSIS, ONE ENGINE! All peanut butter and jelly sandwiches are called peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. Doesn’t matter if you use strawberry, blackberry, snozzberry, Turboberry, wheat bread, white breat, sourdough, carbon fiber...…

come on man... the Gallardo was ONE car, the 458 was ONE car, the Aventador was ONE car... now if Mclaren did a MP412-C and just kept upgrading, like... say the GTR, then fine. you had a mid cycle refresh, more HP, with the 650s, and then call the 675 an Evo, sorta like the Nismo, and the 688 and Evo 2, but to call…

They didn’t even design that engine! it’s a Nissan Engine (VRH) which design began in 1987 for IRL use originally, obviously modified for street use, but that is besides the point. That is one more reason why I want them to do something new. Sure, they can do more with the M838T, but why not get out of this comfort…

never in my right mind would I think what they have isn’t great. I have yet to drive a modern Mclaren, but have driven Gallardo’s, Diablos, Countach’s, Murci’s, 348,355,360,430, scud, 16m,458 550, 575, 612, 599, enzo, Espada, 993,996,997, turbos, even a 959, SL65black, SLR, SLS, SLSblack., and every aston or lotus…

I for one appreciate this, to show us the differences in 7 cars with the same chassis, and engine configuration, w/ or w/o electric motor assist of course. Prices from $184,000 to $1,150,000 but only 13 mph between the slowest and fastest. I love them, and am glad that an english company is going after and sometimes…

Manual

The “Fly Giallo” one is a Speciale A too...

I’d rather be at the Rolex Historics to watch the Aceman in a Paul Newman Oldsmobile. If he’s not competitive, at least it will be funny to watch.

color me green as I am envious.

WAIT.... Another “new” Mclaren?

regarding my prior rant about how all the mclarens look and generally are all the same.

Whoa.