@viasacra89: I choose the fox.

@kellanpan: as of late.

nice video. It looks exactly why I never want to even step foot in New York.

@MaWeiTao: really? you don't understand people wanting something used by someone famous. I admit that I think it's stupid, but I'd rather have a camera used by this great photographer than a jersey worn by a famous ball player.

@appleo1990: why don't you just watch it on a computer like the rest of us.

@johansosa2: +1

Any D-bag that pays this kind of money for Hollywood garbage will get what's coming to them. I wouldn't watch most of those movies in any format at any price....LOL.

@battra92: People who pay double the price for the same point and shoot camera as a Panasonic.

@Psylink: *joins the now thunderous applause*

I can get behind hating lame-o cartoonish HDR with halo-ing galore. But there's no need to fire up your "I hate HDR rant" over these fine shots. Quit being so miserable.

@RacecarBoobTat: link please to your girlfriend photo...I'm too lazy to search.

@CR8ON: +1

@sunspot72: +1 for the funny Canuk!

@zjgz: It'll cost $20,000 now, but the price always comes down .....especially over 5 years.

@gameflyer: Add me to the list of people who would buy it. I f-ing hate going to the theater. Better sound and picture at home, too......especially at Mr. Rich Guy's house.

No one is saying anything about Tom Selleck being there with drunk Superman?

@Ryan: Actually, even though every Tom, Dick and Harry knows they are valuable, starting auctions at a lower price garners more interest. And your fees are lower, too.

The slot is for the speculation, but it should be even bigger.

@mikeslps: And where the fack does the cassette tape go?!?!?

I'm all for spending too much money on cool gear to show people why I work too much, but $500 is re-goddamn-diculous.