I’ve read through the grapevine that the clutch system in the ATTS unit of the SH starts to slip around 250 hp

I believe the SH-AWD system was based on the same tech as the ATTS, which was the first, much as the VTEC we all enjoy was based on the NSX.

I actually had a 1998 Prelude SH. I will say, after all the cars I have owned, this was definitely one of my favorites. I still miss that car:

Won’t a normal rev limiter be enough to protect the engine? 

Our society has an odd fixation with rarity. So much so, that it values it above everything else.

I had an E46 a while back. I loved that car; I thought the lines were classic. I feel like the 2 is the next natural progression of that car (not the E92), so I am naturally drawn to it. But that’s a personal preference thing.

I would argue an 05-06, as the 04's still had the LS1 rather than the LS2. That said, those cars are so rare, many clean examples cost almost as much as a 2010 SS Camaro, which looks better, has better brakes standard, and is more powerful.

The 2 still looks better, imho. I always thought the 1 had kind of a surprised look on its face.

Austin is really more IT than development. I should have specified :P

Literally the first hit I get when I search “Madison WI tech companies” is an article written by Alissa Walker, the most prolific anti-car writer the Gawker group has ever known. I find that disconcerting.

The map just doesn’t do these roads justice... so many elevation changes that aren’t apparent on the map

It may not look that fun via map...

Dear Midwest,

If you are going to get an F-Body Camaro, make sure it’s a 98+. Can still be had for $4000 and will have an LS1 rather than an LT1, a far superior motor, imo.

Counterpoint:

So this is exactly the kind of shit South Coast Mitsubishi would pull. They are the sketchiest and most immoral bag of douches that call themselves a dealership. Don’t believe me? Go look at their BBB rating; it’s a D-, which is up from the F they had a few years ago. Hoarding a bunch of low mileage Evo’s,…

Expediency is not the same as access. Blocking one lane of a freeway for those with money to get somewhere faster is not the same as blocking realistic access to an entire city from those who do not.

I am from the very early, older end of the generation you speak of. I think it is less of a generational issue and more of an age/youth issue; remember the idealistic peace loving hippies of the late 60's? My hope is that at some point of experience, my generation learns that overly altruistic notions don’t usually…

your non V2V / autonomous car will not be allowed inside the city unless your willing to pay the toll or tax.

I think that we could get away with requiring some very basic proximity sensor be placed in old cars.