mike89
mike89
mike89

It’s conveniently parked by the Firestone sign...

Stay true to your heritage, Ford.

Just win and fit in and you won’t need stickers and movements.

One day I hope to make racing more fair for people like myself, a rich guy living in the body of a middle-class guy.

Your closing comment just seems out of place. Sweet their most talented leaders overall and in finance happen to be women. Are you going to write an upset article if they get fired for not providing the leadership asked of them?

When a customer buys a GM vehicle in the future.

dude you cant bring that up and question her bullshit bias. she regreyed me for it after her dumbass miata article bringing up the picture having a man driving the miata. there is nothing wrong with just putting that here is the new gm cfo. but she makes it seem like its a special case by putting in her “for a woman”

Maybe make that part of the headline. “GM hires youngest CFO in their history” is news. But no, the story was all about her gender and some stupid comment about penis chairs. Then again, it’s an Alanis article, and she seems really hung up on gender so it’s to be expected.

This bugs me as well. I love seeing women in racing, engineering (I’ve hired them), and the automotive field. But pointing out “look, a woman did something!” just seems like shoving it in my face, as if I don’t want a woman to succeed. The sooner we can stop concentrating on someone’s gender the sooner it will just be

You and I are in the minority in this viewpoint. I just plainly called the perspective of the article uninteresting and unnewsworthy. Of course, I’m getting shouted down for that, but it’s totally predictable on this site.

Yes, “...for a girl...” shouldn’t be any anyone’s expressions. But that’s what Alanis says EVERY FUCKING TIME she blogs about this.

Something tells me you’re a bigot for not allowing an Indian to identify as Latino if she wants to!

You keep talking about women needing to be treated equally in the automotive world, yet insist on always bringing up the topic. This woman was probably hired solely for her professional competence, but stories like this makes one question the motive. If you want women to be on equal ground, stop talking about them

Diversity Whiner here: Her skills, education, and other accomplishments and qualifications got her the job. You, along with Alanis, feel the need to discuss how great it is that the new CFO has a vagina...something that makes ZERO effing difference to how the job will be done.

What if she identifies as male...have you asked her that? She could be an asexually cisfemale Latinx gay man...

It’s only “news” to progressives, who care more about her sex organs than her accomplishments, skills, and hard work she presented in order to be appointed as CFO.

Your response is the first of what I expect to be many predictable replies. At the least, you’ll likely get multiple stars for your unoriginal thought.

I think the worst part about this is the fact that it shouldn’t be news, but alas it is.

This isn’t newsworthy or interesting. Why should anyone care?

Lmao a truck doesn’t have more room in the back than a full sized car. stop justifying buying a vehicle where over half the volume of the truck isn’t occupy able by the passengers. You like the ego stroke is all it is, your father should have hugged you more.