metaslugx-old
metaslugx
metaslugx-old

@otko: Higher bit rate, zero ads anywhere, no time cap, and the skip cap is upped and reset every hour. It also has a few other knicknacks, including skins and a better mini player. If you use it a ton it pays for itself. Or if you're an audiophile.

@Mr. Mew: It has trouble with GTA IV due to it's inefficient engine, but it can run it on low with decent (20+ FPS) framerates.

@Bobarian: ...er, we all pretty much respect Ebert. This is completely different then the Jack Thompson fiasco.

EA's approach, games requiring payment for goodies in non-new games is ideal. Buy it new? Get the stuff free.

@Mr. Mew: I... really don't care about 40+ FPS, I'm fine with 20 on non-competitive games.

Okay, time to go Devil's Advocate, and this is coming from a bloody Fallout fanboy.

People need to see this as a Full Spectrum Warrior/ Ghost Recon kinda deal, where it's still deep squad tactics, but you are there giving orders.

I feel a disturbance in the gaming force,

@Aipaloovik: It's not the combat that I dislike, it's more of the implementation. You couldn't be any character, you couldnt be a weak brainiac or a forest gump. You had to be a soldier in F3.

Fallout 3 is a good game, but it isn't "Fallout"

@EolirinX: "and to a lesser extent, Fallout 3, did not make substantial shifts to what the games were about from their predecessors"

*feature*

@Mr. Mew: And? I mean, it probably could actually.

Miyamoto made Ocarina of Time. It's been over a decade and he still hasn't topped that master piece. Made good games? Sure. Revolutionized the industry? Without a doubt.

@Thoraxe the Impaler: We're not insulting the game makers as much as we're insulting the fans. One can't blame a company for making money, but one can blame people for giving money to them.

@HfAsianInvasion: I think it has to due with eating human flesh that isn't rotten and/or infected.