It wasn’t the only ending though, I’m not sure how Kotaku isn’t aware of that.

The Witcher author made a similar comment from your last paragraph in comparison to games and gamers threw a fit.

those on staff who finished the game say that is how it ended)

So it’s like GTA V, and everyone suing for a small piece of the pie.

Marine core veterans paint a 9/11 death mural on their big ol’ pickups. If that’s okay, than so is this.

They hardly ever match the quality of the game. Let’s look a victim of a review bombing, GTA V. Up until July 2017 it was getting good ratings all across the board. Then a sudden drop (the twits that reviewed bombed it because mods). Afterwords a slow and steady climb back up. Now overall it’s at mixed. It wasn’t…

By being the creators of the one of the most successful and widely used game engines? Yeah, totally not their idea...

Galyonkin said that this is because “not a single developer I talked to wanted forums” and “the toxicity it brings,”

• Don’t ever judge a game developer based on what they did in the past;judge them on what they’re doing today.

If it works long enough for you to get to the ending then yeah. I couldn’t complete JC3 because the port was atrocious.

Just buy JC2 instead. Performance wise, JC3 and JC4 don’t work worth a damn on PC. Save yourself the headache. 

If youre not involved in the lore and the story that the game doesnt put in cutscenes then youre missing out.

Well, there’s the live services/additional monetization that Activision wanted. Was nice knowing you, Destiny.

So they admitted they don’t want narrative, they want “Live Services” for Destiny. That’s not a plus. But then again, Bungie spent the last year apologizing for their own fuckups, so their word isn’t worth much.

How about those that are tired of Steam users review bombing a game because it dares to go on sale, the very thing people praise it for? Or a 6 year old game being changed? Their recent revenue change only benefits big Triple A publishers, not indies. What’s baffling to see is Steam users will throw a fit the second…

If Epic fails at their store, then what happens to your library?

Really? You are using the “they have less games” argument? The Battle.net launcher has all of Blizzard’s games, the amount is irrelevant. If you want forums that discuss the game it’s already there, each game has a forums page. The difference being one is on the launcher itself and one isn’t.

Unless you were a designer on this game you have no way of knowing their schedule. It’s been proven multiple times that some companies will take content out of their game and resell it later. Or putting the content on the disk and asking you pay for it (hi Capcom!) If companies cared about the wages of their…

but at the end of the day gamer have to do their part in supporting the business of gaming especially in cases like this when Ubisoft gave you a top notch product.

It’s like having the tranny fear for all women that are actually normal—you like zooming in on pic looking for adams apple