metadragon
metadragon
metadragon

Unlike those Bible thumpers/Republicans that freaked over Elvis and women showing legs. Totally didn't happen...

Objectified women from an obvious and unintended physics bug? Fuck off out of here. They responded and are changing it.

Live and let live never existed. Unless you are pretending the outrage from Elvis hip thrusting and Beatle’s music wasn’t a thing. Or women showing their legs in public.

Making more money doesn’t mean anything. There are more significant movies and music, sorry you don’t like that. Not knowing Skyrim doesn’t matter, at all. Your attempt at being superior because you know video games doesn’t work. Though I would love for you to walk up to a doctor and say they are fucking stupid

Sure you can. There are culturally significant movies and music. But games are inconsequential. Elvis Presley was significant and relevant. Stanley Kubrick was significant and relevant. Skyrim? Doesn’t even crack the top 10.

Are you serious? Not knowing what a damn video game is from non-gamers isn’t mandatory. There are more cultural significant ideas that are way more important than Skyrim.

The preservation argument has been used before and it’s kind of bogus.

So nobody review bombed the game because it sold blood and gore separate. (A war game that sells blood and gore separate? Really?) but this is what pushed everyone over the edge?

Wait, did a new season of  Bojack come out? Or are you just catching up?

If Twitch makes you happy, fine. But if it destroys your mental stability and you have other priorities, I.E. children, you better damn well be taking care of them first. Twitch doesn’t have benefits to parents, seems the people in the article haven’t figured that out yet.

I’m sorry but I can’t feel bad for these parents. They literally gave birth to higher priorities than streaming. There are opportunities for gainful employment that benefits parents, this isn’t one of them. And sadly, this is going to boil over one day. Can you imagine if Fox news did a story on this? 

Yeah, I’ve noticed Ubisoft does that very often. I don’t know many other developers with multiple franchise that carry over into each other. I like it, but dislike it at the same time.

I hate to say this, but this is Gamespot level of article. Every patch they complain about the patch not doing much. And the name change probably isn’t going to happen. If it hasn’t happened before now, it probably won’t happen later.

Then you must be the only paying attention to common naming conventions for builds. So, congratz?

True, but there is hard evidence these two game worlds interlink with each other. And I’ve been waiting for title to show how they link.

Ugh, why not the original? AC III wasn’t that great.

Just because they announce a game and design a game doesn’t mean it can’t be cancelled. You know how easy it is to pull up a list of games that were announced, designed and then cancelled later?

I know what they are. So again, why do normal civilians need them? 

It’s unpopular because it’s not true and pretty stupid/uneducated for you imply. But I’m glad we are going to continue to ignore all the studies done on video games and violence. But sure, let’s keep giving people semi-automatic/fully-automatic weapons with extended magazines and laser sights, because 2nd amendment...

Red Laser Sight? Why do civilians need/have access to laser sights? Are we all just pretending to be in the Swat now?