messner87
Jruckus87
messner87

This, Outside of Brad Johnson, and Dilfer, and Maybe Flacco (Although he was pretty damn good when they won the super bowl), it takes an average to slightly above QB to win a superbowl. Look at the AFC. In the last 15 years only Brady, Manning, Big Ben and Flacco have been to the superbowl. No one else. In the NFC,

If Jeffery does leave, I would like the Bears to get Robert Woods (Still pretty young, decent in Buffalo, Kenny Stills (vertical threat), and Kendall Wright (was successful in Tennesee under Dowell. Add that with Cam Meredith, and hopefully a healthy Kevin white, and it’s not a terrible group. Also, if the bears are

I think there are 2 reasons the bears would drop Cutler and sign Glennon, but hopefully not for 15 mil. If you could get him closer to the 12 mil range, for 2-3 seasons, I think it’s worth the risk. #1. Cutler has missed more time in the last few seasons than “chronically injured” Tony Romo. #2. We know what Cutler

Actually, if the Kings pick is outside of the top 10, the Bulls own it. So it would be even worse. But now the Kings have the Pelicans pick, so best case for the kings they will have two mid-lottery picks. Worst case they have the pelicans pick only.

Considering this was acutally the first time he actually played a full 16 games in his career. I would say he probably couldn’t have done better with an agent, and even if he got more guaranteed $$ on the deal, he might end up with less money overall. Jason Peters (a good but oft injured left tackle similarly to

You are ignoring the circus that is Brandon Marshall. Also, finding a decent WR is a whole lot easier than finding a decent QB (Like it or not, Cutler is decent, not good or great, but not terrible or brutal either). I don’t thin Cutler is as divisive in the locker room as fans like to think.

Because he is still under contract. Just because the guaranteed money is gone doesn’t negate the contract. It just allows a team to cut him without having to pay him, or significant damage to the Salary Cap for upcoming seasons. I think in the free agent marketplace, Cutler will likely receive a Ryan Fitzpatrick type

Also, the $$ in the NBA has to be close in a trade, so you would need a contender looking for a wing, with about 20 million in crappy salary to send to the knicks, along with some draft pick compensation. Also, logistically reagarding a team, you would like a 2 guard or a 4 who was a good/great defender to take

But he played PF before KP came on board quite a bit. That was less than 2 years ago. He didn’t like it, cause it was abuse on his aging body, and they were still losing a lot. Also, is it that big of a deal if someone is out to maximize $$, and really doesn’t care if they win a title, cause I think that’s where melo

Nah, no one thought Lebron, Wade and Bosh were being selfish. People were mad because they worked together to make the league less competitive, and because people wan their superstars to “want to beat the best”. People viewed the heat team with hatred because 1. the decision was a terrible idea. 2. The whole “8"

But, When the team in question (Minnesota) has a 26 year old point guard, who can’t shoot 3's, doesn’t play defense, but is a slightly better assist man, and a player in Kris Dunn, who is likely to need to be the starter next season. It would make sense in a couple of ways for Minnesota. #1. Rubio is under contract

I like brown, smart and plynyk (Plus johnson for salary match) to the bulls for Butler and Gibson. Both are solid 2 way NBA players. I threw in Mcdermott and Portis to the celtics (So both teams get 4 players each). The bulls would need brooklyns pick in 2017 to give up butler, and a future first would seal the deal

I have a simple solution, and it worked in the trade machine. Jimmy butler (Legit scorer) and Taj Gibson (basically a 12 and 8 guy)Mcdermott and Portis for Smart, Brown, Olynyk and Amir Johnson (to make the $$ work). The bulls would also need to get brooklyns pick and either the 2017 celtics pick or another future #1

I don’t think it’s a boston persecution theory. I watch a fair amount of NBA basketball, and it seems like the officials routinely wait to see if the ball goes in before blowing the whistle if it was a “questionable” foul. It’s one of my biggest complaints with NBA officials. If it’s a foul, blow the damn whistle. I’m

I’m confused. Were the guys following and recording revis, and he asked them why several times and then he got violent? Or were they following him after he punched a couple of them.

When you break down the numbers, it’s pretty close to the same % as the “general population”.

Izzo is actually a pretty great guy. I generally hate MSU as a rule of thumb, but I really do respect Izzo (espcially when compared to other “top” NCAA coaches like Coach K, Pitino, Cal, and so many others who are total D-Bags).

So it’s ok for a woman of a certain stature to physically assault a man, because he’s a big guy? I’m not saying it’s ok for him to hit her either, it’s obviously not. BUT, size is not a factor in something being assault. They are both guilty. She just took the worse of it because of her size, but she also started the

Again, your logic is faulty. You want consequences because of the outcome. Reverse the roles for one second. If Mixon, pushed and slapped a girl, and she punched him, and he fell down, hit a table and got screwed up, would you be blaming her? No, you would be saying he started in, and good for her for fucking him up.

I’m sorry, but, your argument is wrong. So he is responsible for his reaction to her physical altercation, but she is in no way responsible for the consequence of her physical actions?