You’ve been on Gawker before (I assume since you get to be in the blacks) yet you cannot identify real racism. You must be an undergrad at a state funded university.
You’ve been on Gawker before (I assume since you get to be in the blacks) yet you cannot identify real racism. You must be an undergrad at a state funded university.
I fell there is some parallel here with gun control.
Cite it or it ant true
Yeah those 50 yr old texters
According to society you are a cold soulless monster
Convince them how selfish they are being
Yes. Gawker never uses images to manipulate the opinions of their readers. Nope never.
*face palm* reading is FUNdamental
Will the members of the “gray abyss” ever be allowed to actually feel like a part of the “commenter community”. The only way to get pulled out of the grays is by providing “Good comments” that are noticed by The Gawker Media Community. However, what is the impetus of spending the time to write “good comments” if they…
Why don’t you look at your own post titles and get back to us. Horrendous assinine click bait.
I don’t think you know what the legal definition of identity theft actually is
How many men die by the hands of their female partners? I know this is a much smaller number. Your stat needs context for maximum impact otherwise you open yourself to basic criticism.
Let us not pretend this is a conservation effort.
Can we attribute a color to your writing?
honestly cannot respect anyone who uses woke or bae
Nipples are deadlier than bullets.
Reading can be fun! If you did read the whole story you will see they aged the women in the game to be a little tiny bit less creepy.
Meanwhile in the real world...
Love how you picked a nice unflattering pic of Schumer. No subtext there.
Shhhh, you discovered his secret.