Their problem was that they established the parents as way too normal for the sake of comedy. For this twist and the overall dysfunction to work, the parents had to have some sort of problem— obsessed with making world changing geniuses, too weak etc. Why did the parents agree to brainwash Sherlock and delete any…

What if the film splicing had been Eurus and Mycroft would've just owned up and ended up talking to Sherlock and John? There needed to be more consequences for John getting shot.

It would be a nice twist if the statutory rape bullshit turns out to be "no, really, she's a pedophile".

That actually might be a feasible twist— Betty notes that Archie looks a little like Jason Blossom and Grundy could've been tempted to trade him in for a younger model.

But at least it seemed a little more obvious that this could be one of the things that messed him up, thus creating 'Norman Bates'. Not just 'forbidden romance'.

To be fair, that has been the plot of almost every Archie comic since 1945.

It is really funny. They talk about how 'second wave' was nicer even though those were the ones who were super anti-any porn and had Valerie Solanas trying to kill Andy Warhol etc. Third wave feminism's biggest problem is that they're a little *too* nice to men— always trying to be sexy somehow.

It would've been funnier if he completely got them all wrong, then they told the woman she only had to get one right and then *she* bombed it.

They needed a stringier wig. The sketch would've been hilarious if Kate's hair and makeup looked more actually "Conwayesque" the whole time (which means slightly like the cryptkeeper).

I have definitely known and been the girl who was 'friendzoned'. I think the main difference is usually that the girl will blame herself while a guy will blame the girl. Though there are definitely still some women who are like "when will he notice me? he only likes girls who want to use him". See— "You Belong With…

They really miss out on the feeling of isolation by adding in all the VFD stuff early. Granted, I think it will make it easier to understand in the long run, but in the first few books you really thought that no one could ever really help them.

Honestly, I found the Quagmire's backstory a confusing in the books, so maybe it's to help easily confused people such as me.

In general, though I think we've seen enough of mental illness being used as the main cause of a character's villainy. Especially when we see relatively fewer victims of violence in the movies who are mentally ill when in reality it's the opposite.

Teen Wolf is MTV.

:( I preferred this as an article.

The boy who plays Nickolaj is very cute and a decent actor (he really nailed that "Famine" joke).

They just got confused when they heard that the movie was about rebelling against a corpse-like, corrupt bag of evil farts and his half-machine second-in-command.

Yeah, basically there are two kinds of crazy people: those that are so out of touch with reality that they hurt themselves and others and those that fear it so acutely and unnecessarily that they paralyze themselves with fear.

Yeah, I think you have to have a certain sympathy with robots to 'get' this show. They don't have to be entirely autonomous to have value. They had a similar problem when they were reviewing Humans. The fact that most of the protagonists weren't human and didn't act human was a major problem for the reviewer.

Yeah, maybe in 1992 I would've considered him to have a point but now she seems a lot more empathetic.