just imagine Allen Iverson or Barry Sanders playing soccer. They remind me of Messi.

"However, the best thing about this - only time will tell."

Your point is that having a ton of weapons can be a good thing (and there's obviously truth in that). I argue, however, that you've oversimplified and cherry picked your examples without looking at how often it doesn't work. I'm saying that you picked a handful of teams with HOF QBs (and Palmer, though those 2010…

As long as RGIII can be Montana, Kurt Warner in his prime, Manning or Palmer in his prime, those could be good examples. Every one of those teams had stellar QB play and a solid O line. I'm not saying RGIII can't be that good, but without a line he might not be that good.

I've been barely grazed by sticks, etc. and you always grab your face and often hit the deck. It's just an instinct, especially if you've been cut a few times. It certainly looks terrible in slow motion though.

In other words, your anecdotal evidence is anecdotal. Other posters have posted links to contradictory evidence. You've acknowledged the links and other information, and not allowed it to inform your position one bit. Maybe you're not being a dick, maybe you're just not good at thinking.

Would your response that you're black make me happy? What the fuck kind of nonsense is that? Seems like you either need to devote some time to explaining why race is at issue here, or not randomly throw in that the sportswriter is black. Whether or not you are black, the rules of logic still apply.

Your obsessiveness in defending your misguided bullshit is fun to watch. Keep it up.

So they don't really have it better than everyone else on campus. Thanks.

Reread what I'm replying to. I sure got the impression that you need a good athletic program to get any money donated, and therefore to have good academic programs. So, I posted three schools with obviously great academics, and bigger endowments than any of the athletic powerhouses you want to pit them up against.

You forget that he was doing this unarmed and wearing something like boxer shorts. The police are supposed to be the ones that try to prevent the violence, not the ones starting it.

I can't believe how many people totally missing this joke. I guess I can because people are stupid. But jesus, this one is obvious.

I'd replace training with roid rage and totally agree with you.

You've written a lot of words doubling down on the same unfounded guesswork and anecdotal observations. Quantity isn't really quality now, is it?

You said they had it best of anyone on campus, now you say you would never trade places with them. Why don't you want the best for yourself?

You've now admitted that all you're basing this on is some anecdotal observations and your complete fucking guess at how the system might change if we let it change, and yet refused to back off one inch from your certainty that you know best... that doesn't strike you as the most ridiculous thing here?

This is why Harvard always wins the national championships in football and basketball, or comes in second to Yale or Stanford. Right?

I disagree. If you want to add value, provide analysis, not guesses. If your whole analysis is just to guess at random, BOLD shit. You should have to answer for that random BOLD guessing.

Explain how that's inconsistent with what I said:

Why hit the smallest girl in the group? She's walking with guys. Aren't they arguably the bigger threat to the cops he's "protecting"?