I’m sure there is a clean Camry in the desert somewhere. A little bit of parts switcharoo and...

You mean they don’t leave the factory on fire?

Thanks a ton. I love my car, but these are also flattering pictures of it. They conveniently hide the completely rusted out rocker panel, and the rusted out quarter panels and rear wheel arches, and the sagging rear suspension etc. etc. The 3rd gen Falcons look great from some angles, and super frumpy from others.

The vintage VW scene definitely has the most thriving roof rack culture. In a lot of ways I think I’m a VW guy that somehow ended up interested in old Fords. I can’t help it, I love boxy cars, 3-on-the-tree shifting, and working heaters (burn). I don’t relate to most other people interested in old American cars though…

this is why we can’t have nice things (nude beaches) in this country... There’s always someone offended by the nature of body parts.

Make valet mode called Richard Hammond

Watchoutwegotabadassoverhere.jpg

“I just bought a ‘85 Kamaz and need to get it below 300 millirems in only 16 days!” 

How do the wheel/tire sizes compare between the Roxor and original Jeep?

1982 Porsche 911 (unknown model) in a carport in rural VA.

I think it’s wonderfully silly.

Two words: PIZZA PLANET

But the important question is: did she give you wood?

A thousand stars for this reference!!!

2 whole dollars

How do you manage to get so little power from that size engine?

Especially while driving on the wrong side of the road, with no steering wheel!

Yes, my driver’s seat selfie is killing my love life. And every other picture of me. And my appearance. And also my personality.

I (and anyone else who notices) can’t take your point seriously when you use “break” instead of “brake”. It’s not sarcasm or mean-spirited, it is just constructive criticism.

You need to back that claim up. On basically everything but the most bleeding edge performance cars, the breaks are more than capable of overpowering the engine.