So the lack of any physical evidence of rape, or even of the blow to the head she claimed to received doesn't matter at all to you? Or is that the fault of 'rape apologists' too?

I'm just curious as to why you leap to distance yourself from it.

And yes, it is still possible that this woman was lying. It's just extremely improbable

You're the one that didn't read it right, so maybe you should try covering your shitty reading comprehension skills?

No, I was saying you're ignoring the lack of evidence. You clearly don't know how to read.

I know how the constitution works just fine, thanks. Just because it only applies to the legal system doesn't mean you all don't look like fools with your "guilty until proven innocent and even then" attitude. Yes, its possible he may have committed a crime, but there isn't any/enough evidence of it, and that is good…

Yea, I ignored your little 'gotcha' question because it's as stupid as your bigotry. Anyone who denies someone rights based on something like sexual orientation is a bigot regardless of what sexual orientation they are.

Edit - you know what, it isn't worth getting shouted down because my opinion is unpopular. I'm just going to say that the Constitution is clear on that whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing.

"So my point being that simply because you don't support something doesn't mean you are actively fighting it"

No, the emotive BS feminists are trying is not the same as people who actually vote for candidates who vote to deny two adults their right to marriage and women their right to medical privacy. And yes, if you're denying rights (marriage is a right in this country according to the Supreme Court) to two adults based…

The irony is when people share their opinions of things like gay marriage and abortion those who oppose it are portrayed by a majority of the media as some sort of monsters

We should all save them for the one thing they were great at: hauling half a ton of garbage as well as shovels and rakes and implements of destruction.

Detroit may have been declining since the 60's and competition from the Japanese but it was absolutely NAFTA and other free trade treaties that killed it and most of it's decline has been in the last two decades. Your taxation argument falls flat on it's fact simply because they still make cars in Michigan. If it was…

Nah, Antibiotics can turn it orange too... was on a preventative TB regimen when my dad was diagnosed and that shit turned my urine orangish... and made me itch like crazy.

Yeah, I get it. You're politically/historically ignorant. End of story.

I refuted your ridiculous point yesterday. Try to keep up.

Yes, the Republicans caused manufacturing to leave - they opened the door to it through their free trade ideas knowing damn well a large chunk of industry would outsource... taxes/unions or not, it's still cheaper to build in Mexico than the US.

Watch out, your projection is showing - you're the one blaming others for the failings of your political ideals. Obviously companies will move manufacturing to where it is cheap and if you're the politician that changed the rules to allow them to leave, you're (Republicans) the one responsible for it.

You will see the same line of logic as MTY85 with regards to come of the financial repeals too - Well it was BILL CLINTON who signed the repeal of Glass Steagal, stupid liberal! Sometimes I feel like the concept of compromise is so dead to these right wingers that they can't comprehend Democrats actually doing it in…

Of course he is - when a Democrat president and a Republican Congress pass bad legislation, it's the sitting presidents that gets credit, even when it's a blatantly Republican idea. When a Republican is president and Congress is Democratic, it's Congresses fault. That way they never have to admit they were wrong on any…