From the link:

Basically, they attack so indiscriminately that they ended up attacking a law firm that's actually trying to do good work, and is (or was) on their side. But because of the attacks, Anonymous may have ruined this law firm's business.

A front-facing HD camera would make sense, but I wouldn't mind it if they got rid of the rear camera entirely.

And all I'm saying is your disappointment is being felt round the world. Hear those cash registers tilling? Those are the cries of disappointment.

The sentence I quoted makes it sound like you think they built out all of the architecture that they're occupying, when they didn't. If you meant to say that Grand Central Terminal is a monstrously amazing feat of architecture, then we're in agreement.

"Yeah after the 4S let down (and yes it was a let down)"

"I don't care as much about the screen as better hardware inside and better cameras."

I just couldn't get through the block of text, but after I commented, I realized that everyone's comments seem to be formatted in that same, unreadable block. In any event, my original response was only about whether a thief is liable for stealing your stuff if you leave the door open. If you disagree with his…

"There was supposed to be a protest at Apple's monstrous architectural annex"

"There should be a "slave tax" put on all products coming out of Foxconn"

I'm going to be honest, I didn't read most of what you wrote. All I see is a block of text that seems to be sidestepping the original question posed. You think Apple is liable? Fine. I'm just addressing the example the OP used.

"No you accused those who disagree with abortion as being women haters."

" You have an apartment in a shitty part of NYC, and you forget to lock up when you leave. You get broken into without any forced entry. You're sure as shit just as much to blame on that one. You should know better."

"Just because you disagree with abortion doesn't mean you desire to control them."

"The same goes for any other collective decision we as a society decide to make."

I read it, and it classically dodged the inherent misogyny of the issue by trying to re-frame pregnancy and child-rearing as something we all bear equally. But we don't, and pretending this is anything other than fact is self-deception. No matter how giving the father, the mother will always, 100% of the time, have to…

Only one person has to give birth to the child and be its mother. Don't dodge the question.

+1

"Bokeh" actually (specifically) describes blurry, out-of-focus elements in shallow DOF images. Wiki also says this: "The term comes from the Japanese word boke (暈け or ボケ), which means "blur" or "haze", or boke-aji (ボケ味), the "blur quality". The Japanese term boke is also used in the sense of a mental haze or…

Well, again, I'm not claiming to have the answer; what I'm saying is the Gizmodo interpretation of the word is more plausible, absent evidence. Of course, if you could show something from their website explaining what "chacha" was meant to mean, that would definitively explain it.