"Are you kidding? Everything Apple makes is at a premium of at least 50% if not 100%, at least if you look at it from the hardware perspective. Laptops, phones, tablets - all significantly more expensive than the competition."

Except it is literally in beta. That's not just an assumption; it's fact. You can look on Apple's websites, or you can look at their keynote:

"Any other part of the animal used has to be explicitly made known in the product description."

I think what you're saying takes the point too far in the other direction. It's unrealistic, and unreasonable, to expect Showtime to be able to finance a show like Dexter without asking viewers to subscribe to the whole channel. The financing wouldn't make sense for them. This is also a big part of the reason why you…

Here's what's interesting about the prognostication on Apple's TV plans: the price. Why? When is the last time Apple released a feature product that was genuinely at a premium compared to equivalent products of equivalent build quality and features? You're going to have to go back a few years to find one. Anyone who…

"While it's unsurprising that Apple would be keen to roll Siri into more of its products, this could explain why the beta software isn't quite right yet."

"Yes everyone, I realize pork belly is not technically bacon"

Right, but I'm talking about that picture.

That looks like the sticky pork buns of Momofuku.

You're a good 20 years late on that wish:

"What does it matter?"

The problem is that they're trying to have their cake and eat it too. They don't want to give us specifics to actually scrutinize them over, yet they'd have us believe that their products are wildly successful. Either they should stay mum and let our eyes bear witness, or tell us what's up. The in-between is…

Why would MacAttack have had to have been there? This is all pretty well documented. The myth that Apple "stole" Xerox's GUI has been long debunked, but persists in certain corners of the tech world none-the-less.

Has anyone noticed that Amazon does not actually say they are selling "millions of Kindle Fires," just millions of Kindles? Why are they so cagey about the sales of the Fire if it is successful? And I'm not saying it's not, but if their policy is that they don't talk about sales numbers, then this press release is…

"Ok, it's clear you're missing a few points. There are two purchase points involving the Android OS: the manufacturer and the consumer."

"I wirelessly synced my iPod on my home network but when I went back to school to sync on my school's network it treated my new iPod as a new device because of the different IP address."

Patents have to explain how that system is going to use commands that do things with input from a user. Like, it has to actually lay that out, in a way that will allow someone else to reproduce it.

*Bows*

"Yes, yes you can."

"Not the search engine that reads my mind, or the best selling mobile OS..."