He's white, using that logic.

I don't even get out of the way when this happens. I'll shoulder bump which ever one is to the left of me - man or woman. If its going to be a head on collision, I just walk right at them and smile until they notice (or run into me).

It's the fact that you didn't bring up the relationship between exploitation and empowerment in regards to twerking by certain African-American women and girls - that's where you went wrong. Your inattention to this primary point is the problem with simply stating that the locus of twerking is with African-American…

Glad you speak for all black women, except you don't, and have many conversations with my black peers that think very differently than yourself. It's pretty racist to think that a single aspect (or single opinion) is emblematic of an entire population of millions.

It's called squats. Lots and lots of squats, and then a lot of running and/or cycling.

So, be Lady Gaga?

It's alarming that you're conflating twerking with black sexuality. And by alarming, I mean racist as fuck.

I'm with you on this one. We have a culturally defined default, and deviations will call attention to themselves.

What in the world are you talking about? And what does libertarianism have to do with any of this?

I situated my comment to highlight the housing and highway subsidies that were put in place post WWII as determinants of suburbanization. Prior economic systems based on race and class were not directly aligned toward suburbanization, though your point is an important one to make.

May I ask what level of education you've completed? And what critical framework would you prefer for Gawker/Jez comments? (If you're not at least post-doc, your opinion is invalid, btw). Given your use of 'undergrad-ass bullshit', I imagine you're a first or second year masters student (at best), feeling pretty good…

Beyonce is all about being 'crazy in love'. And by 'love' she means marriage designed for fame-gain and money. And by 'crazy', she means living a life designed for nothing other than fame and money.

Technology requires the exploitation of natural resources and the dispossession of labor through efficiency, directly leading to what is now 40 years of continued disemmployment worldwide. We've already destroyed over 70% of our natural forests and similar habitats for the production of food for an overpopulated…

That's why I stay away from the free performance of social media. When I perform, I perform for money. And by perform, I mean have sex. And by sex, I mean humiliation. And by humiliation, I mean money. But not on the internet, so everything's fine here, we're all ok.

Yes, people of all genders get to be judged for their demeanor. In fact, feminism is exactly about judging people not by their gender, but for what they do and how they act.

It's weird, because while RJ was talking about the view to the inside of faux-feminist vaginas, your view seems to be from the inside of your own ass.

We have all the money we'll ever need for this, given that we repatriate the trillions of dollars that US firms have stashed in overshore tax havens, when we dismantle the imperialist military programs, and when we use progressive tax rates that keep 400 people from hoarding over 50% of the world's wealth. The world…

Wrong. It's bad for the speculative financial component of the economy that relies on unchecked and infinitely expanding growth on a planet of finite resources. The speculative financing of our economy is also the component responsible for the mammoth global inequalities and every single bubble-based recession,…

What is universally agreed upon is that our current population is destroying our planet in catastrophic ways. Those who calculate carrying capacity based on current and projected resource exploitation and waste externalities know for a fact that this planet cannot survive a population of more than 3-4 billion, let…

Given that the current overpopulation of humans has been unequivocally shown to be destroying the Earth, this can only be a good thing. No matter how people choose to calculate 'carrying capacity', the fact remains that our current population level is wreaking havoc. This is inarguable.