YESSSSSSSSSSSS. It’s gross! Use it only for show cakes that aren’t meant to be eaten!

It’s never to early to start grooming the next underage celebrity into an objectifiable, exploitable asset before deciding to ridicule her into oblivion when you brand her as “crazy” when she hits her early 20's.

Looking at this lineup, I’d rather have Richie Havens sing “Freedom” for 72 hours than listen to most of that crap.

That mixing up of time tends to happen when people write about the cultural memory of something that occurred when they were toddlers.

I’ve been an advocate for Ms. Lewinsky since I stumbled upon her TED talk. Her acceptance of her role in the situation humbled me and forced me as a small frame nerdy guy to examine my past. Her talk made me acknowledge that I could have done better at times and made it clear that I still have work to do to be a…

Let’s also note that shitty Ken Starr got to go on and have a career that included writing a letter of recommendation for a confessed pedophile, representing Jeffrey Epstein - another sexual predator pedophile, and fostering an environment of sexual assault at Baylor and CNN is more than happy to have him on and get…

that generation is so jacked full of cluster b's and narcissists who will freak the fuck out so loudly it will never happen.  Theyll just keep killing decent younger people.

I just finished reading Shrill and want to watch the show but I don’t have Hulu. I hope all the cringe and eye-roll inducing moments over her white privilege are cut down on the show because I can see how it would exclude a wider variety of audience. Lindy's abortion experience made me put the book down for a few…

Nah, she’ll be fine. She’s still pretty and she’s still rich. She will also be getting a lot more attention and at the end of the day that is the end goal of these influencers. Attention. As attention means clicks and clicks mean money.

edited because I was being mean. I need to curb that side to me, it’s bad press. I mean...

I do want to reply to my own post and try to come at this from a slightly more sympathetic angle: I suspect I get what you were doing with this article, and I hope I get where it’s coming from. It’s snark. It’s intended as snark, and nothing else. It’s lulz. The internet likes the lulz. Some parts of GMG haaaaate…

I was inspired by her too. I would vote for her again if I could (but I wouldn’t wish another brutal election cycle on her). I think she would have made an incredible President. I teared up when I voted for her because I was so moved. The snark in this article is really rude and unnecessary. There’s a lot of people…

She sure does. She never said she was going to run and now that she’s finally official said “I’m not running” they’re still giving her shit about it. But also salivating over Bernie. SMH

Hillary has the sense not to run again.

Doesn’t “difficult to work with” usually mean that she doesn’t let producers put their hands on her? Or is there anything concrete?

It takes a lot for me to trust rumors that a woman is difficult to work with, because it usually just means “not a total doormat.”

“[Rami Malek] reportedly fell somewhere around the front row...”

I’m in agreement with all of that, and I didn’t mean to mischaracterize what you were saying. I responded to another comment that sheds a bit more light on my stance, but there are some unintended publicly-facing elements of social media that are often no fault of the user, other than simply having a social media…

I already dread her inevitable and painfully long “Fired4Truth” tour when she goes on Hannity or whatever to cry about the SJWs and the PC police and the Liberal Fake News Media.

Yes, give me a link to the recipe somewhere up front. After I scrolled past the rambling beginning (where Gwen is rambling about why it’s good to have a rambling beginning) and I finally got to the heart of this article, I found some good information that I really liked.