Where do you come up with this?

I have seen first hand, on many occasions, how good traction control systems can be off road, if calibrated for the job.

It gets something for you and Ford, an attention grabbing headline to publish the day after the reservation system opens.

Lots of confusion in comments about current shifter options on domestic half tons, although it is a little complicated in the F-150 line. Here is how they break down:

GM twins and Ranger are size/price competitive with Tacoma, and Nissan is cheaper because the truck is ancient and isn't worth more. How is the pricing "all screwed up"?

This is the same size as the "bloated" Ranger.

Everything in your post about theithe Edge is flat out wrong. Except the bit about dropping the focus and fiesta, that was and still is a mistake.

Except no one actually buys "starting price" trim levels. They exist purely as a marketing gimmick, accounting for less than 5% of actual production/sales. 

CR-V compares to Escape on size and pricing, not the Edge. Sante-Fe is more in the size range of the Edge, but driving the two back to back will make you realise the Edge is worth the higher price.

Ford does not need to, nor will they, undercut the Wrangler. Why should they? Sure it would be "nice", but there is no logical reason. They are offering a directly competing product where there has been none. They will sell every single one they can build. Many who would never consider a Wrangler simply due to how…

Just get a Wrangler. Every alternative mentioned will have less aftermarket support in the way of accessories, modification kits, etc., of if they do offer it, it will be twice the price of the similar product made for the Jeep. Not only that, there are always tons of used accessories and aftermarket parts for…

You have to remember that it is not a person looking at each make/model/year sale data and coming up with these values, it is a computer program without a lot to go on. It has selling prices from auctions, sale prices from registrations, and VINs. Serial numbers contain far less information than people think, in this…

“It goes quicker if you pay sticker”

Are you serious? Everyone wants it yesterday, do they “need” it that fast, no. Do they “want” instant gratification, they sure as hell do. When I look at a customer and tell them the exact unicorn (very specific combination of options and must be in a specific color) of a truck they want isn’t around and they will…

The factory never put the AW4 in a Wrangler. It was the 3 speed Chrysler 32RH from 1992 to 2002, and then the 4 speed Chrysler 42RLE from 2003-2006.

It all comes down to the payment, they are buying the cheapest version of the cheapest truck, financed over 8 years.

They were never ever ever going to make that. I’ve been saying this to friends for the past couple years everytime they shared this photoshop trash. Clickbait sites like Motor1 etc. publishing Bronco stories and using photoshopped full size Broncos as lead images have created an expectation that the Bronco was going…

That’s not the way it works. Dealers can’t order all the base trucks they want. Ford will only build something like 3% base XL supercab Rangers (65% XLT, 32% Lariat). That's means a dealer would need to order 100 Rangers to get 3 base XLs.

Wow, don’t even need to click the link. The answer is right in the URL text, people on smartphones are the cause, not anything to do with forward visibility.

Please stop calling the Bronco Sport a Renegade competitor.