matt-e
Matt
matt-e

The full size truck market is HEAVILY discounted. MSRPs are meaningless, as they are merely a starting point so the manufacturer can advertise huge rebates. To properly compare full size trucks you need to look at rebated pricing. That 75K limited would sell for 60K, and the 42K base model crew. would be down around

Corsair launched as a 2020 model, this will be coming in the second year of production. Corsair rides on a significantly modified 2020 Escape chassis which was designed with HEV and PHEV in mind. 

Right, and they sure as hell wouldn’t put “Turbo” on an electric car with no turbo charger just for branding....... oh wait.

Funny I'm replying to you twice. Nissan is already the new subprime kid. The Altima is the new Avenger/200 for those with crap credit, and the Rogue is there if you prefer your umpteen percent loan attached to a crossover/SUV.

The “spot” if the market for the Titan is people who really want to buy a truck with a Nissan logo. Toyota has the truck for the person that wants a full size but won’t buy American for made up reasons, and you get that whole "it's a Toyota so it is the most reliable piece of machinery ever built". 

Fullman disclosure. I am a sales manager and look after inventory at a Ford dealer.

So much wrong in this. Ford only recommends premium for the EB in F150 when towing for increased performance. Day to day good ol’ 87 is fine.

Ram trucks are cheaper than GM or Ford. In other news, the sky is blue and water is wet.

I remember the first time I saw one at an RV show, the Nissan rep there was talking up the factory 5th wheel prep in the bed. One glance at the available payload on the door jam sticker showed the payload couldn't cash the check all the hype wrote.

Tuck Tape!

No there isn’t room for a 3.5 in a ranger, and a high revving flat plane V8 with peak torque way up in the revs has no place in an off road truck application.

No worse than Lexus, in 2019, still using cruise control sticks from 1990s (perhaps earlier) era corolla.

The comment about the plant was to reinforce the point that you can use the Ranger frame dimensions to infer the Bronco's frame width. Yes it would be easy to bring in different power units for additional options. It would be much more difficult to have the same line building on two different width frames, one for

The majority of commenters seem to think this is the “old” Bronco:

The 3.5 EB is in its second generation and not being phased out. It remains optional in F150 (necessary to get max tow rating), and is the standard and only engine in the Expedition and Navigator.

There is more to the discussion than both being BOF. The F150 it a full size vehicle with a full size frame, the Bronco will not be a full size vehicle so it will not have a full size frame. Yes, every Bronco Photoshop floating around the web showing it as a full size are lies. It has been said many times, in many

The GT 500 is coming with a cross plane crank 5.2 V8 with a supercharger. Yes it shares the 5.2L displacement with the flat plane crank Voodoo, that is why ford has gone out of their way to use the phrase “cross plane crank” when talking about the GT500 5.2 to avoid confusion. Evidently it still isn’t working as

The Aviator is VERY good.

Supper Duty too!

Most people “seldom tow”. Even an avid RVer, ATVer, boater, etc. is still towing only on weekends, using the truck as a commuter vehicle the rest of the time. Even with worse fuel mileage while towing, the higher torque (at lower RPM) of boosted engines makes the towing experience much less stressful.