But at the same time, just since we haven't SEEN Athelwulf commit adultery, we also can't assume he's innocent.

Just because I don't want to see someone get tortured and mutilated, doesn't mean I'm on the side of adultery. Thanks for the generalization, though.

What about Athelwulf? I'm sure he hasn't been 100% faithful to his wife since it wasn't unheard of for a man to stray at that point. Sure, we haven't seen it happen, but do you think he should be punished too?

[ Sorry for the long post! I think I have a problem.. o_o ]

I don't think they should make Liv & Babineaux a couple, in my opinion. It would be just like the other TV shows out there following the trend of the detective getting together with their strange sidekick. I'd feel like I was watching Psych or Castle. Same stuff, different story.

Very true. And I also agree about Blaine not becoming a love interest.

When he shut her down like that, I hurt for her. haha. I was surprised that he didn't even try to give her a chance to explain herself. That's all any of them (Major, Liv's roommate, and Liv's mother) ever wanted was an explanation, and that very well may have been their best chance of getting one. On one hand, I…

Yeah, I don't pick up any romantic chemistry either. Which is why I would hate to see the writers try to put them together. lol.

Loving this show so far, although I fear for it.

Possibly, but why would this make Rollo that happy? Physically, Rollo makes me think of a bear, so that's why I think it's him. Plus since Bjorn means bear, I wonder if that would be too obvious. Then like I said, I don't know why Bjorn marrying a princess would make Rollo so happy that he'll want to dance naked.

I wonder… And this is because I'm too lazy to pull up a map… If Ragnar and Co. are planning on heading to raid Paris, could Wessex be on the way there? If so, maybe this would be how he finds out about the slaughter of his settlement. Although would Ragnar just turn around and head to Paris anyway, leaving Ecbert to…

I agree. I thought that as well. Which could have been really interesting, because it would have undoubtedly shed some light onto Harbard and who he really is. Then again, that would also kind of ruin the mystery behind Harbard.

Kalf being Lagertha's spy could possibly be interesting, but to me, the introduction of Horik's son & Co. (Borg's wife and son), disproves that theory. Why would Kalf seek them out if it wasn't to help go against Ragnar and Lagertha? Lagertha would have had to ask him to do it, but why would she? Especially since…

Excellent point.

Yeah I agree. The only thing I can think of is using the whole "his family was brutally murdered by Ragnar and his throne was stolen" story to gather followers. That by introducing the "rightful heir" and bringing up whatever points that make Ragnar look bad as a king, people will support Kalf and Horik's son. But a…

Yep, so maybe there are still some lingering feelings going on there..? ;D

That is a very good point. And I agree. Why should they matter? Horik and Borg were defeated. That's it. If they do try to make it work out as it seems it will, it will be disappointing.

Yeah I definitely did not see Siggy's death coming at all. I half expected that she would jump into the lake and look around under water, but that the boys would have vanished. Then she'd resurface all confused and that it would probably turn into a dream, or another vision.

I'M PANICKING.

1. Why, Floki? Why? I'm hoping that Floki won't actually or totally betray Horik.. Though the potential betrayal is blatantly obvious, why hasn't Ragnar talked to Floki about him getting comfy with Horik?
2. Why do the writers insist on destroying some of Ragnar's best relationships?! Lagertha, possibly Athelstan, now…