I meant that, yes, but I also meant this.

Because it becomes harder for said accused rapist to get a fair trial now, and who knows where we will be societally in the future. It may very well be that at some point in my lifetime we get to a place of guilty until proven innocent for sex crimes. That is where it intersects for me. The longer and longer a victim…

This assumes that A: the evidence has not degraded over time and B: that all relevant information related to the case is still available (e.g. notes of the investigating team, hospital records, and so on and so forth.)

The people who would support this idea might argue that there isn’t any.

Before I go further with what I’m about to say, I need 3 things to be understood.

Why do you have to fix me? Did I say something so beyond the pale that it needs fixing? I simply prefer one to the other.

Dammit, Lindsay, pull it together. Like go to rehab, eat some five guys, do some crossfit. This is enough.

the absolute state of the republican party right now.

ok thank you. I know I may get flamed for even asking that question, but I genuinely wanted to know.

not to be a pedant, but how does the accused rapist confront his accuser under this idea?

I’ve watched everything people are referencing. It does not change my mind.

Cool. Have a lovely day.

There’s so many questions I have here, and not enough time.

I don’t actually think he’s talented. I mean, I don’t get the appeal.

I’ve seen it. Like, everything people reference to me to get me to the church of Idris Elba is something I’ve seen. It just doesn’t move me. Like I don’t get it.

Na B I’m good. Here’s my cup of tea (as straight man admiring other straight man for attractiveness.)

we agree to disagree I suppose.

because he doesn’t charm me. he feels phony to me.

?

he’s just not anything i like.