You don’t get to decide that you’re not racist. Reducing racism to a matter of ‘unpopularity’ both normalizes and glamorizes it. Even giving a shit about politeness to Nazis in public spaces normalizes them. Both those actions are racist, no matter what color your skin is or how tolerant you are of people of all races…

Fine. White feminists and liberturdians have the right to argue that people who are impolite to Nazis are assholes, and liberals and intersectional feminists have the right to view you as a complicit racist Ivanka asshole for believing that people are obligated to be polite to Nazis in public places in the first…

I’m not disagreeing that they can kick you out for both. I’m pointing out the fact that they decided that yelling at a Nazi did not warrant the same consequence as being a Nazi, that I agree with them, and that the white republicans and independents here who are confused and angry about why not everyone in society…

“She’s just lucky that what she decided to go off the rails about is popular and considered good at the time.” You just exposed your own racism and white privilege with this one sentence- by reducing racism to something that’s just ‘unpopular’ instead of dehumanizing and evil. You also seem to be under the delusion…

So we’re using the slippery slope fallacy here? Because she angrily confronted a Nazi, she must be someone who’s just a screaming rageaholic at all people for any reason?

He’s not getting grief for ‘minding his own business’, he’s getting the consequences of deciding to become a Nazi famewhore. Any unpleasant experience he has with the public- whether it’s on the streets, on a campus, at a library, at a gym, at a restaurant, at a church, at a funeral, at a wedding, etc. is something he…

Nazis deserve what they get, and people who defend them are complicit in their racism.

The people in charge at a gym would still have the right to kick someone out of a gym for criticizing Trump as they would for someone being a Nazi- nobody needs or is entitled to a gym membership. However, the fact that you can equate speaking badly about trump to a political ideology that threatens and dehumanizes…

He’s not entitled to be able to stay there and people of color should not be expected to give good customer service to a Nazi. If he didn’t want to get criticized by and kicked out of places by decent people, he should have thought about that before publicly endorsing and promoting segregation, hate crimes, and…

Oh please. He’s not a victim of anything. Comparing being publicly but non-violently criticized at a gym to being mugged are obvious false equivalents, as one is a violent crime that also comes with theft of property while the other is just an unpleasant (but non-law-breaking) experience. Being blamed for getting…

I doubt she will ‘treat all of their patrons this way’ (new Deplorable speak for “somebody publicly criticized one of us’, I guess) because she specifically targeted this one person for criticism because he was a famous Nazi. Patrons who aren’t that are ‘safe’ from this non-violent public criticism she dealt out.

They had the right to kick both of them out, but chose to only use that right on the person who had the history of aligning himself with and publicly promoting dangerous, violent, discriminatory political beliefs, for the good of themselves as a business and their other non-white and non-male patrons and employees.…

No. The commenter did not say he could be kicked out for identifying as a man. He could be kicked out for having ever behaved in any of the ways the commenter listed. If you see those behaviors as ‘just identifying as a man’ then I’ll call an ambulance as you seem to have overdosed on some red pills, sir.

There’s nothing inaccurate about that statement. Conservaturds are always bloviating about how the first amendment gives people the right to have Nazi beliefs that they spew in books, blogs, protests, etc.. That same amendment also gives people the right to criticize the Nazi. That’s what the lady did. The first…

If Dylan Roof learned from Nazis that he shouldn’t leave random strangers just peacefully sitting in their church alone if they happen to be black, why should Nazis be left alone to be served in a place with women and people of color? If you wanted to be left alone, you should have thought about that before aligning…

Yep. And they probably wouldn’t even be offended by it either. Who wants to eat food prepared and handled by dirty Trump Trash anyway? If I found out a restaurant I went to was owned by Alt-Reich fecal coliform bacteria, you wouldn’t even have to kick me out.

I sort of feel like people don’t really owe the public (outside of family) honesty about things like pregnancy, abortion, sexual history, or sexual orientation before they’re ready to give it for whatever reason, and that mocking or dragging people for it years later is kind of crappy. At this point I’m not really…

So far I haven’t heard her make any statements defending him, and the rumor that she bailed him out has already been debunked.

I think silence is one of the few appropriate responses she could have in this case, when you consider all the famous and not-so-famous people who have come out and made public statements defending spouses, relatives, and coworkers who raped or beat someone. Coming out to publicly disown him and promise never to speak…

That’s silly. As if her life revolves around getting slut-shamed by a homicidal d-list one-hit-wonder maniac on a song.