How’s it different? Both involve going out in public places and in both places there’s no logical argument for why a dress code ban on leggings for people who aren’t even employees should even exist in the first place. Both are places where people should be expected to just deal with the fact that you’re not going to…

Would you argue that point if the dress code required employee’s relatives to wear bikinis or little booty shorts though? That if they don’t like the requirement, they should just go somewhere else instead of complaining about it? Because there always seems to be a double standard with the issue of dress codes and…

‘It’s nothing to do with prudishness.” You and I are just going to disagree with that one, because a person who wasn’t a prude wouldn’t think to make a policy against leggings in the first place- especially for people who don’t work for that company, and I’d say that whether it was an airline, a grocery store, an…

No, to me it still sounds pretty stupid for an airline, restaurant, grocery store, or anything else to police the clothing choices of employee’s off-the-clock relatives- just as stupid as policing the clothing of any other customer- provided that everything is safe, legal, and hate speech free. A no-leggings policy is…

No, I still think it’s as stupid as a grocery store or restaurant refusing to let employee’s relatives in based on them wearing leggings. As long as everyone’s dressed in a way that’s legal, safe, and doesn’t involve hate speech or threats, it shouldn’t matter to any reasonable person how an employee’s off-the-clock-…

Even saying that the suffering of non-black women isn’t as bad as the suffering of black men doesn’t work though. White women and black men both share a mix of privilege and oppression, so while whiteness saves white women from oppression that’s more specific to someone’s being black, a black man’s being male saves…

You know he’s made ignorant, dismissive, minimizing statements about misogyny (and transphobia and homophobia too) in both his skits AND in real life interviews right? Dave Chapelle, the guy who joked about why it should be okay to call women whores if they don’t dress modestly (a quote that was used and celebrated by…

You have a valid point, but not with the “We should save the outrage for people who commit acts of violence against women; or those that write policy that negatively affects women and not against a comedy bit that may not accurately reflect his views of women” argument. David Chapelle has made dismissive and…

I disagree. There’s a difference between watching something just to look for a reason to be offended and being a progressive who enjoys something like comedy, novels, music, etc, but who just gets annoyed, frustrated, or bummed when a comedian’s, author’s, or artist’s misogyny or dismissiveness of it (for example)…

Is censorship ALWAYS bad though? And even if it is, are some things (such as young boys being groomed/brainwashed by hate movements into being the next Dylan Roofs of society or people being taught that their decisions to commit other hate crimes, honor crimes, rapes, terrorist acts, domestic violence, or other…

Pissed me off as well. At this point I just don’t value the lives or safety of the hate group sector of our ‘great country’ at all and have zero respect for any conservative or liberal defending their ‘right’ to speak, exist, not be excluded,etc.

If there was a secret government organization dedicated to killing off members of these little hate groups (including white nationalists) I’d pretty much be ok with it.

Oh lovely, another tiny-dicked MRA shitsack bro who’s made it his online mission to stan for misogynistic males onlineObviously idiot fans of his like you care about other people not validating this little man-boy and not blowing wind up his ass, because you were butthurt enough about even the slightest possibility of…

Oh lovely, another tiny-dicked MRA shitsack bro who’s made it his online mission to stan for misogynistic males onlineObviously idiot fans of his like you care about other people not validating this little man-boy and not blowing wind up his ass, because you were butthurt enough about even the slightest possibility of…

What about people advocating beating and raping children and child porn?

This. It’s an attitude that seems to come from some mix of privilege, a desire to play the ‘Cool Liberal’ role, a falling for the slippery slope fallacy of ‘if we don’t respectfully,politely tolerate people who’s ‘free speech’ is the dehumanization of non-cis/straight/white/male people, we’ll create a country that…

It looks like the headline was written BEFORE the writer knew that the person sent this gif to this politician with the actual intent to harm him. But the framing of the article didn’t come across as saying “This politician deserved to be assaulted because women being threatened and put at risk for harm by internet…

That’s not how I interpreted it at all. I thought they were just saying that threatening and doxxing women online should be taken just as seriously by the FBI as this was.

“Well my fear-based hatred of trans people, sex-working women, and modesty-rejecting women whom I classify as self-objectifying nonfeminist cool girls far outweighs any of my supposed feminist values. It’s what I’m known for” would have worked just as well. SMH at all this Bible-Belt-Sanctioned feminism.

The fundigelical pages my sister follows on FB were practically creaming themselves: “See, this feminist (boo hiss) thinks that trans women aren’t real women! Even *they* know it’s wrong!” Not surprising. When feminists spout transphobic, whorephobic, slut-shaming, or victim-blaming rhetoric, religious…