That bull-fight is kinda coming from nowhere, and is the only surreal imagery that is allowed in the film… granted, a strange choice, but one I do enjoy. Everything else is hyper-realistic in 1960s-terms.

I'm not saying "unbelievable", but "scarier". There's a difference. By the way, we agree on the Bush II presidency.

Farting boner corpse sounds right.

Well. I liked this article quite a bit. Where I disagree is that Fail-Safe is the inferior film. I think Fail-Safe has its own merits and is really effective in what it wants to achieve: It's basically a horror film with a "this could happen to you!"-message in the end. This is all the more chilling, because you have…

Also it was written in 30 frames per second.

Well. This might be the most obvious film since Race earlier that year.

Oh man. I left it on during working on my computer, and the last 20 minutes are really unsettling and scary.

That's actually a good observation. I do think he's a talented guy, but the way he uses his talents are just so…. lazy. He doesn't seem to be invested in anything at all anymore…

Family Guy has always been very uneven in terms of quality. The multiverse episode might still be their finest. So no shuttering here.

I've made a stop-motion film once. It's hard work, but astonishingly good for novices to film, since you can control all the elements relatively exactly.

It's… Complicated.

I feel like Batman vs. Superman is the Captain and Tenille of superhero films.

In Stalin's mind, it must be Leon Trotsky.

A John Oliver video as headline? When did the A.V. Club turn into Huffington Post?

yea. And they've got that glittery vampire-boy as Peter O'Toole.

Damn Kurt Russell stole my film idea.

Awww… after the last years of electric music, I'm starving for some good old-fashioned rock guitars.

Whatts a book?

Uh. You mean, it's a parody of all these self-serious disney-life-action-remake-flicks trailers?

Meh. Too self-serious… as if the people couldn't handle irony.