not half as much as he would have hated the fact that the new iPad has a stylus.

definitly fake. (at least parts of it) But still funny

Bu...but...WHY?!?!

Haha. Friends! Right. I’m totally sure they exist, and I’m totally sure they they don’t represent your own personal biases exactly. Bring Em round! Maybe some of them can have a halfway civil conversation without crying that everyone who disagrees with them is morally bankrupt.

What you just described is the very definition of compromising your ethics. Do you think people get points just for saying “I don’t like this” when they agree to do something bad in order to also get something good? either the ends justify the means or they do not. Sanders accepted that in his mind the good of the…

Yet Sanders was willing to compromise his stance on that issue, so clearly he didn’t care about it that much. Worse yet, if he possesses the foresight you claim and knew full well what the outcome of this bill would be, its all the more reprehensible that he would have voted for it regardless. How you fail to…

I fully recognize that bills are not singular things and one must choose whether the good outweighs the bad. Sanders and Clinton both made the same decision on that bill. They both decided that the good outweighed the bad and they can both be held similarly accountable for that. If you cannot understand that, it is…

I granted Sanders credit for having foresight. But frankly, If I’m a white person, whose role demands that they vote on an issue effecting Black Americans, I’m going to go to the CBC and see what they have to say.

And you know what, while I’m not okay with the Iraq war vote, as that frankly, was more easily foreseeable…

Clinton also Made that vote with the support of 2/3rds of the congressional Black Caucus. Are you telling me that they dont care about Black people living in poverty.

Sanders had foresight in his criticisms. but he still voted for the bill. He still decided that having this bill was better than not having this bill. We…

Well, we sure that’s a flag or just something with a flag-like pattern on it?

ah there it is. I was wondering how long it would take for you to start making accusations about paid shilling.

Again, call Clinton corrupt and a liar all you want, but as we’ve illustrated, Sanders lies as much if not slightly more. Stein, meanwhile, is an anti-science quack. Johnson is a libertarian and the GOP is…

The crime bill you called clinton’s (Which is absurd, she voted for it, fair enough, but she sure didn’t sponsor it) by your criteria might as well be called Sanders crime bill because he too voted for it. How people continue to act as though thats somethign they can hang Clinton with and not Sanders continues to…

There is plenty I don’t like about Clinton.

However, There has been plenty I haven’t liked about pretty much everyone I’ve ever voted for. Insisting that it’s Bernie-Or-Bust is like being an art school grad who insists on continuing to live in their parents basement until they are offered their dream job at their dream…

Again, Clinton is rated as of comparable honesty to sanders. you have a source on that. Again, you insist on acting as though my sources don’t exist so you can keep beating the dead horse that is the argument I just countered. “nearly 70% of Americans” can believe whatever they want, that doesn’t make them right. An…

I’m not saying sanders is corrupt. I’m saying that If you believe Clinton is corrupt, then you must believe Sanders is corrupt to so thoroughly toss aside his morals and endorse her so enthusiastically.

Clinton doesn’t seem to be having a hard time winning votes, just like she didn’t have a very hard time winning votes…

Correct the record is A PAC utilizing a well understood FEC loophole to coordinate directly with the campaign. It focuses on Social media advertising and engagement. Do you believe that the Trump campaign is not running social media campaigns or utilizing well known FEC loopholes out of the goodness of it’s heart?…

You’re wasting my time because you refuse to engage in the argument at hand. You tell me Clinton is paying people to give her good PR online. I say “So what, that’s standard practice” to which you’ve responded by citing articles that only reinforce that she’s doing this. Thats not what I’m arguing. I posed you a…

Wow. then how corrupt is Sanders to endorse her?

Nice Editorial btw. I could find one with an almost identical title backing Trump if you want. That’s my point. That piece isn’t about who is the right choice. It’s about saying Clinton is the wrong one. That’s the legacy of the Sanders campaign.

The fact is Clinton…

You make self defeating arguments, post articles I’m not debating exist, or reflect reality, but merely argue lack context. You continue to ignore that point, and choose instead to continue beating the dead horse that is the existence of the articles themselves. You then expect me to be impressed by how well educated…