markravingmad
MarkRavingMad
markravingmad

What would have been cool would be if in ME2, when you let EDI off the chain, her hologram changed from the weird sphere thing to a person, and then she would be, like a hologram of a person you could interact with on the ship. they’d need a new squad mate for ME3 since she wouldn’t be able to leave the ship (Which

its white male reporters going to trump rallies because their the only ones their respective outlets feel safe assigning to cover them.

I mean. not sure what the play here is but I guess you’ve kept me engaged, so maybe you know what your doing. although swapping trolling tips hardly counts as trolling itself does it?

The calling for me to make an actual point in spite of the fact that that’s exactly what I criticized you for before I realized you

Hmm. not sure what you’re playing at. Remember, with trolling like you’re doing , the objective is to get people to engage. You trying some reverse psychology perhaps? Risky.

Hmm, actually, that post was good though the entire opposite of what I was going for. Just the out-and-out rage really did work without making it too obvious...that said, people are more likely to take the bait when it looks like a flimsy argument. Then again, you got me pretty good so you seem to know what you’re

a little better. (less direct name calling at least) but yeah. you need to pepper in an actual argument once in a while, otherwise you’re too obvious and they’ll know you’re a troll. still, not bad.

a combination of things. I think GB is still a lot more popular than those franchises, but you’ve also got people who are butthurt over the gender swap. personally, I hated the idea from day one because it was another reboot, and fear it will turn out exactly as well as robocop and total recall.

nice try. But come on. the troll game is up. it should have been obvious because you weren’t making any actual arguments (Of which there are plenty of valid ones to choose from). you were just name calling. classic trolling. it is however impressive that it took me however many posts to catch on. Not bad. but

Dude. don’t feed the trolls.

The point is that if you have something to say, calling everyone you would aim to make it to names like a child isn’t going to do anyone any good. If you’re not trying to be persuasive, then all your doing is trolling, which I confess, it’s taken me far too long to realize, is what you’re probably doing, in which

I just lead every criticism with “I really wanted this to be good”. That tends to help. not much...but some.

Have you seriously not yet noticed that I have yet to actually disagree with you? In reality, all I have done is point out faults in the way in which you make your arguments. And for this, I have been repeatedly and personally insulted by someone who, Somehow, is attempting to make a point about a toxicity they see

The point is, right or wrong, your choice of medium sabotages your message. Case in point, You’re preaching about so called “nerds” in the comment section of a bloody Kotaku article. The fact that you seem to think anyone cares whether or not you actually have a smart phone, or how that would even matter, furthers

Okay...This is starting to get a little absurd.

*Crosses fingers* please be better than the last one

Just so long as they do it better than they did female thor. Gender and race swaps can be cool. Blatant tokenism, not so much.

sent from your iPhone

It looks like crap in the same way and for the same reasons that the robocop reboot that you forgot about until I just mentioned it was crap: it (appears to be) another cheap modern reboot of a movie that really shouldn’t have worked and only did because of when it was made. Reboots are, by and large, trash. They need

Wait, comic book chick makes the same criticism of the new ghostbusters and makes the same points and nobody bats an eye. Rolfe echos those same points and everyone looses their minds. So are these points valid or not?