markmorel
SilverBulletBoxer
markmorel

That's all I needed to know.

No pics in replies, and you got a wife!? All I got's this dumbass stick sounds like it's rainin'.

WRX owners. They have a lot of stereotypes associated with them, so it should be a cinch.

The NSX is definitely one of the best cars of all time.

o_O

If the current EVO's block is so much better than the STi's, I can't wait to see the next gen EVO.

Neat.

The engine in the SVX is a great engine. It was mated to a 4 speed auto because Subaru didn't have a transmission that could handle the torque. Putting the engine aside, the SVX was very overpriced because it was over engineered. It made a solid 230hp, but then was pitted against the 300zxs and 3000gts of the time,

Subaru's engines run the gammit of good/bad/ugly. The NA 2.5L SOHC is very lethargic, but I guess some people like it in the 2.5RS, which weighs less than 3k lbs. The 2.2L DOHC from the 90s is fairly bulletproof but isn't special otherwise. The EG33 is awesome because it is that 2.2L with two cylinders bolted on and

The 1996 Subaru legacy 2.5GT engine was pretty horrific. It was the first year of the bump from 2.2L to 2.5L. It made 155hp on 91 octane, and it had issues if you didn't give it premium. Subaru fixed that issue in subsequent years with a slightly different tune. It had electrical issues, was prone to head gasket

Congrats on your Star and COTD! I offer you , as a reward for your awesomeness, a new turbo for your Saab, because, well, you know, those things can be temperamental.

"You drive an Alfa Romeo you say? Why yes, I'd love to go for a ride."

This is what I wanted to go with it.

"When this baby hits 88 miles per hour, I better see some serious tit."

I fail to see the issue with model boats.

but they are compared to cars, which we assume is the basis for comparison used to generate this argument.

I've been driving my wife's accord while my LGT is in the shop, and the lack of torque gives me a sad. It has a decent amount of get up and go for a 4 banger, but there's no uumph at all.

I think "trucks are heavy" is a fact, not a stereotype.

Pour one out for that C4.

That middle statement about years makes no sense to me. Maybe it's the subject-verb disagreement.