In America, people enjoy bad translations and think they're hilarious. In Japan, a couple bad lines make them rage?

I assume you're implying that those aspects, which put the candidate's character into question for many voters, hold the same weight as having lied about your age by 1 year in a past job does to voters in Japan?

It's interesting because the ending of ACIII...

So? Who cares what they were supposed to be? What we have are North Koreans and it makes for a really stupid premise. It didn't work in Homefront so why would it work in the theaters?

Well that's a negative way to look at it.

"They're like Metal Gear Solid 4's Beauty and the Beast unit, but one tenth as interesting."

The comparison would put it in context. This review makes the game sound neat, but put against the backdrop of Super Smash Bros. which it clearly was inspired from, it's almost a copy-paste with every feature being a slightly dulled version of what SSB has already done.

Exactly. At Zynga, they specifically made "fun" a low-priority, and looking at some of the Facebook games I play, fun and profitable can very much be in the same vein. Zynga does not fit there.

It's also fairly obsolete in its use in American English. Technically it's not incorrect but it's used so seldom and almost only in specific contexts that it might as well be if you're trying to naturally speak American English.

Pirates! Purple! Gold! ARRRGGGH!

Since when does the failure of a company that's been on the decline for years indicate a crash in the entire industry?

Um, you're mistaking me with someone else. I never said any of those things.

Adamantium isn't real. And it should be "spelled," not "spelt."

It's not about whether Jesus existed or not. That's not important. It's the simple fact that BC/AD have origins that are ethnocentrally tied to Christianity. Changing to BCE/CE is just a way to create a way of using our dating system with purely scientific connotations. It's not about who Jesus was, when he was…

Note that Nimona's shark sometimes has featureless boobs.

This article is terrifyingly childish and shouldn't have been done.

But once again, that's not the main reason why BCE and CE were adopted; BCE and CE were adopted because they're secular ways of measuring time. It's the exact same system that relied on Jesus' supposed birth to measure time, just without the religious connotations. It wasn't an issue with whether Jesus' birth was…

Aside from the huge religion based off of him, there are multiple tombs with people named Jesus (it was a common name), several Roman records about a Jesus being executed (which, if they are to be believed, place Jesus' birth around 2-4 CE) and just about as much proof as there is about Galileo or Muhammed being a…

It does make sense. So much of our modern history and world are built upon Christianity which has its apex in Jesus. Saying it doesn't make sense is, once again, completely missing the point of why we use BCE and CE instead.

That's not it actually. Read the other responses. Technically no person is "provable," but Jesus did most likely exist. The truths surrounding his actual life are what's entirely vague and probably will be nothing other than guesswork.