i didn’t say anything about whether he should be a cop or not.

Yeah right. I’m pretty sure that if someone liberated you from a rape prison (and most likely certain death), you wouldn’t be given them side eye if they called you a little girl. You’d be fucking calling him your savior.

If I had a choice of patronizing a place where I’m smiled at or a place where I’m not smiled at, I’ll pick the smiley place. It’s a huge value-add for people.

And Trump doing so is horrible and it’s terrifying that that didn’t implode his entire campaign. But we don’t discount it just because he seemed to assume it was a private conversation despite being on mic.

LOL - “profits” from a charitable foundation do not get funneled to the people who started the foundation.

I already voted for Clinton over a week ago. For the first time in the nearly 20 years I’ve been voting, I felt bad leaving a polling place, but I voted for her anyway. I never told anyone to vote for Trump, or said Trump was a good alternative to Clinton. I never even mentioned Trump which is what makes your claim of…

Calling her imperfect is like calling a shit sandwich not 5 star cuisine.

Like I’ve said downthread: I already voted for Clinton by absentee ballot, but Trump being an absolute monster shouldn’t mean that we let establishment democrats off.

The guy who had an old racist woman say Obama was a Muslim at one of his rallies and his only response was to get uncomfortable and say that’s not true ma’am?

See, I’d agree, but one of the emails that’s leaked is one where Podesta and crew basically put off implementing basic email security. Eight years ago. When Clinton was the incoming Secretary of State.

What does Donald Trump have to do with the bad things Hillary Clinton has done? Can I not say Pol Pot was a bad leader without someone else saying ‘well compared to Hitler he was actually far superior.’

John Podesta is not the government. The DNC is not the government. The Clinton campaign and DNC are not government groups, they’re partisan political groups.

Well you see, Clinton being bad is a subjective value judgment I have made based on her hawkish foreign policy, her closeness with wall street, her cynical flip-flopping on marriage equality, the language used by her campaign surrogates during the primaries (particularly Chelsea’s denouncement of single-payer) and the…

There is no false equivalency. More than one thing can be bad at the same time. Two people can both do bad things, that doesn’t mean those two people are exactly the same.

<sarcasm>You should know that disagreeing with the Democratic party’s action automatically means you support the GOP.</sarcasm>

The DNC leaks about trying to scuttle the Bernie Sanders campaign? The Podesta leaks about Hillary receiving debate questions in advance from Donna Brazil? The leaks that indicate a direct link between Clinton profits and their charitable foundation?

They’re both in trouble. But as a progressive, the DNC is a lot more important to me. The Republicans can go die in a fire for all I care, but dysfunction at the DNC is important and it’s been conspicuously ignored for years.

Brazile leaking the CNN debate questions, the campaign’s coordination with the Correct the Record super PAC, the Band and Gibson memos on the Clinton Foundation’s role in influence peddling, and her comments towards Wall Street? You’re living in bubble if you don’t think there’s damaging material in Poedesta’s emails.

You can’t say that here. Leaks about Hillary Clinton cheating during debates and colluding with the DNC are tainted...Trump leaks are sacrosanct.

Let me get this straight. The disgusting aspect of the leaked tape isn’t its contents, but the fact that it was leaked in the first place?