It's entirely their prerogative to make that change. It has nothing to do with you or Steam. It's not objectively bad. Someone might have muscle problems that makes that button easier for someone to use. I don't even need THAT level of justification because it is entirely THEIR choice.

And for fucks sake, that isn't…

What about if there are missing textures in places? How many missing textures do you need before it's not good enough to ship?

Also, when you write test cases for software, they are written for that specific software. You can't write generic test cases that work for all software because software isn't homogeneous. Even when the big 3 force you to go through TRC's, TCR's and Lot Checks, they are mostly concerned with the infrastructure of the…

I'm not going to get into defining another term for you when the first one isn't sinking in, but what I just said wasn't a straw man. I never attempted to represent your views in any way, or anticipate or expand on what your views might be (on the section we are talking about). I simply pointed out that cholesterol…

"Perhaps it's a gameplay feature, perhaps there are reasons. It would depend on the context"

You don't seem to understand that if there is ANY room for doubt, then it's a subjective issue, not an objective one.

But I disagree with you that RMB shouldn't be used to shoot. Undying had magic on the left button and guns on the right. It worked. I disagree with your OPINION that shoot shouldn't be on the right, and me disagree is proof that this is a subjective issue, not an objective one. Opinions aren't objective. Try again…

Also, you said "could be considered....". That leaves opening that someone may consider the opposite, which means it is distinctly NOT objective but subjective.

"If FPS's use the left mouse button for fire, and then a game uses the right mouse click for fire, and doesn't allow for a re-binding. This could be considered as an objectively poor move to make.

"Good for you" is a massive misnomer anyway. Cholesterol is needed in small amounts. Nothing is "good for you" if you have too much. He doesn't know shit about scientific or methodical process.

"If the context is "what is good for your blood". Then we can say that foods with iron and low-cholesterol are "good" for your blood."

Not enough cholesterol can lead to Cancer, depression, anxiety and low birth weight for pregnancy. You don't know what objective means, stop trying to use that word. You literally and…

"obvious objective points. The simplest: does the game work?"

Nope. Not objective. The game "not working" depends on the metric. All the way from the .exe never launching to there being a missing texture on the final screen of the game. Where do you draw the line in that and say "that game doesn't work"? And I will…

"This just requires some simple testing and verification from Valve."

That's hilarious. Just some minor functionality testing of EVERY GAME EVER. What you suggest is astoundingly impractical. If you give your seal of approval to something, then you are taking on a massive burden of accountability. What if the game…

Bravo and well said. They aren't and shouldn't ever be arbiters of content. It's not a closed system like Apple, that's why it doesn't operate like one.

Which game has a deep story that is better than/less pretentious than Bioshock Infinite? I would love to play it.

She was originally a placeholder, how fascinating.

Well I've enjoyed reading all your posts on this topic so in my opinion you should post more as you make a great contributor. :)

Critter Crunch is their highest rated game on Metacritic apparently. I don't even know what it is, but it sounds like some match 3 phone shit to me.

Translation: I love Xboxes and straw men.

Superbrothers: Sword and Sworcery EP?

You brought this on yourself.