I had this happen, except it was a legit call. My credit card company wouldn’t authorize the charge because it was coming from Vegas and I normally never go anywhere. I had to call the credit card people and tell them, yes indeed it’s me in Vegas and then I called the front desk and they put the card through again. I…

Fake is the new conceited. Back in the day, you’d just call a girl conceited if you didn’t like her. The reasons didn’t have to comport to the actual definition. That’s why “fake” is equally vague, they just want a general slam that is difficult to defend oneself against.

Scott’s parents were jewish, and both died within the last year. They’re rich, but they’re not WASPs (White Angle Saxon Protestants). They seemed to be decent people, but as you well know, an addict will do what they do regardless of their family situation. It’s not always the fault of the family that the addict does…

Three bits:

REALLY!

Huckabee was behind this visit, I am sure of it.

The daughter of our friend’s next door neighbor died this morning at the hospital from being shot by this piece of garbage. She was a young adult, just starting out on her journey in her first classes at UCC having had a difficult year prior. She was doing all the right things, and now she's gone because this bastard…

I'm going to start blotting my pizza just to annoy people like you who think you can tell everyone what to do and be an authority on rudeness. Maybe you are that authority, because it sure takes one to know one.

Any answer from a man that would show any level of direct family involvement would turn into that man being lionized for his extraordinary efforts and commitment. These questions are traps for women to be judged on how much they're NOT doing, as perceived by others.

The questions were from FB users directly as they were coming in live. How should she be “challenging herself to answer tougher questions” when she was answering the questions she was actually given? Or do you really not understand how these FB Q&As work?

Then why is the headline written in such a way as to imply some sort of scandal or falling out among the parties? Most people know that if someone’s face is blurred out, they haven’t given permission for their face to be broadcasted. I’m sure it has nothing to do with the Kardashians and everything to do with those…

I do not have a responsibility to you, or to do anything you ask or to continue an argument that you seem overly invested in. You have not changed my mind about Hillary, the rule of law, or anything else. You have only confirmed my ongoing belief that some folks on the internet want to argue for argument’s sake. If…

The issue I have with this non-scandal about the email is that equal treatment is not happening. There are countless examples of others who acted in a similar fashion, yet only Hillary is subjected to this endless nonsense. It is political theater, and you know that.

I honestly just thought you'd enjoy it. Pardon me.

You might actually enjoy this article on the philosophy around wrongdoing. http://www.socraticmethod.net/socratic_essay…

You came into this initially stating the law isn't the only metric. I never suggested there was another metric, but you seem to think there is. If this is so important to you, why don't you state your metric outright? Or do you just prefer arguing for no reason? This is gettin boring.

To get back to the real issue at hand instead of your deflection, you seem to believe Hillary is lying, and that all the media stories are true. I believe this is a non-story, a non-scandal. You support whoever you do, and I will continue to be a Hillary supporter. http://m.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/201…

Nice to know you consider the law to be a nonsense standard. You may not agree with the law, but it will be the standard you’re held to when the time comes. You’re more than entitled- especially to your opinions of who is trustworthy and who isn’t. The NYT already had to retract their own faulty story about this…

Correct. When you and the media, Congress, and general public are willing to agree upon a metric that makes more sense and apply that metric equally to everyone who acted in the same or similar fashion prior to THE LAW being changed, let’s talk again.

Again with this non-story? You guys realize you’re carrying the GOP’s water on this pretend scandal, right? There was no wrongdoing. The laws were different when she had this server than they are today. This is why you don’t see a major investigation over the Bush II Administration losing over 22M emails which they…