Mid-sized to compact CUVs pay very little fuel economy penalty compared to a mid-sized sedan, and still have significant practicality advantages

You could power your model plane with one too. This is the O.S./Graupner 0.30 cu. in. Wankel...

Yes?

I enjoyed it and will happily listen to more. Good job guys!

Pepperidge Farm remembers.

Yep. I don’t know about the rest of Europe but Subaru seems to have given up any semblance of catering to the UK market.

I’ll definitely give this a go, I HOPE IT’S GOOD.

Same.

Mad skillz.

Lose the wing mirrors and that looks like the front of every never-gonna-get-made-but-this-is-definitely-the-future concept car ever.

Officially, many (all?) 11spd bicycle links are not supposed to be reusable, although I’d hazard a guess than many riders do treat them as such. 10spd and below typically are reusable.

This is good advice which I’m more or less living by as an adult, but I’m not sorry that as a child/teenager I forced myself to read things that weren’t strictly enjoyable, because some of it was an education.

Won’t somebody think of the hot models?

Good article. I’m curious as to when engineers started to think about NVH as a thing to be designed, rather than just a by-product of other design decisions. I guess we’ve long thought that luxury = smooth and quiet, but stuff like engineering the timbre of slamming a door is a whole other level.

Ah yes, the Three Gaping Buttholes trim package.

Come to Europe, there are tonnes of incredibly dull cars with manuals.

This looks brilliant. Can’t believe how cheap the cars are too. Is it because these are ones that wouldn’t pass the shaken anymore so they have minimal value?

My brain immediately settled on “Mazdang”.

I just wanna know if there’s a naked human concealed behind that hardtop. (See main image.)

Speaking as a huge Jalopnik fan, the tone of this article is honestly unbecoming of this site. I enjoy a bit of snark, this just comes across as mean-spirited.