I am drawn to the '65 Lincoln Continental from The Matrix:

@Jim Topoleski: Thanks guys! I'm pretty sure they edited the article after a couple people in the comments pointed out the presence of the actual car.

Isn't the actual full-size car featured at 3:05?

@Canuck Chinaman: *Click click click* ENHANCE! *type type type* Zoom in on that reflection ... ENHANCE! *click click* ... hmmm, looks like a ... cheese plate?

The backend of that thing is staggeringly cool. The way the lights reflect off the chocolate shavings and create a hard angled glow — stunning. Contrasted by the iDiffuser ... I just love it.

1973 BMW 2002 Turbo

Who is taking these awful photos? This is not the first time I've seen a set of photos of a car on this site where there are 3 or 4 shots from the same worthless angle, with no wide shots of the whole car. You need a better photographer, or a better source.

@bearslayer: Yeah, I think this is a clear example of how "design by committee" can fail. #rallyfighter

It's a great idea and all, but that thing is just ugly as sin. #rallyfighter

I totally dig your writing style. I am thrilled at your addition to the Jalopnik team! I'd love to see some videos of a sideways evo with you at the helm. #mitsubishilancerevolution

Is that a Slim Jim™? #samsmith

I prefer this video. Not as completely submerged, but the car is less modified, the guy drives out, and there's more giggling. #lolcars

@Racin_G73 - dirt track legend (some day ... maybe): I too would like to know what make/model that bike is. It is dope. #carcrashes

@Jagvar: Hells. Yes.

@LoganSix: eh?

F-Type please.

Wow. I guess I'm in the minority when I say that I think the subtle tweak is absolutely fantastic. I think it modernized it a lot, and looks totally bad ass.

I am surprised at how bad this feature is. Usually I love the features you guys do, but this one just falls flat.

How the F do you post images?

[img][gallery.mac.com]]