Eh, I think this might just be a case of confirmation bias (or either you’ve missed a few articles). Here’s a bunch of Borderlands 3 articles on this site with positive tones:

In this case, yes.  But it’s not uncommon for one ref to point at the goal, and another to signal that the puck was hit with a high stick or signal goaltender interference.

They’re definitely not required to announce or signal a call. NHL announcers all the time lament about how they wish it was more like the NFL in that they had to announce the call to the crowd. Now, whether or not they have to HAVE a call in case the video is inconclusive I’m not sure about.  I’m guessing yes.

A semi-sub has an underwater deck and a above-water deck (which never goes underwater) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-submarine

Citing facts and using evidence to back up one’s argument is now “yelling the loudest”?  And not the one that’s essentially plugging their ears and singing LALALALALA at the top of their lungs?  Sure thing, buddy.

You’re welcome. Here, have some more.

It’s auto-loading. Not automatic. There’s a difference.

While perhaps true, the AR-15 isn’t an automatic weapon.

Except what he wrote is 100% accurate. It’s usually illegal. Under the Unified Rules of MMA, which all U.S. state athletic associations currently adopt (but haven’t always), it’s against the rules. Back when PRIDE was around, they had different rules for their events outside the U.S. that didn’t match the U.S. rules.…

Except that Rubio has expressed support for Kaepernick, and said that he wanted the Jags to sign him when Foles got injured, and that if he owned them, he would bring in Kaepernick. He’s also said that he thinks owners are making decisions about Kaepernick because of decisions other than his talent. He’s also been on…

You realize that Wyden is a Democrat, not a Republican, right? As are two of the three congresspeople that signed the letter? And that some of them have actually spoken up in support of Kaepernick? ...Right?

I’ve seen all those tweets (assuming you’re talking about the ones from 6:30-8:00 in the video you linked). None of them seem like they’re a expression of support to HK autonomy.

No...but literally no one is asking Blizzard to do that, either.

FWIW, Tencent owns something like 40% of Epic, and Epic came out and basically said “we would never do something like Blizzard just did”.

Yeah...except these aren’t the same screenshot. You can easily tell this by looking at any number of the fans—v-neck lady on the right side, clapping guy in the top right, pats fan in the middle left, etc. Oh, and the fact that Deadspin probably didn’t magically add a few pixels to the right side of the image that…

The argument against that would probably be that “skill” isn’t a single dimension, even if your ranking system is. You can take two players, who are evenly matched against each other. Match them with someone else, and one player might crush the third, while the other player gets crushed by the third.

Just FYI, a portion of all key sales goes towards funding their eSports events and prize pools.

You’re only offsides if you’re past the last defender and past the ball when the ball is kicked.

Here’s the problem. The penalty for breaking this rule at this level of event is a fine of 100 Euros. That’s why you see people breaking the rule all the time. This is a common occurrence. It’s this line in the rules where the controversy lies: “in serious cases, in cases of repeated infringement or aggravating…

With the new rules put in place last year (balanced field, no running starts), the success rate has dropped from like 23% to like 7%.  It’s reaaally hard to recover an onside kick nowadays.