macetheace002
matt_h
macetheace002

Creeepy.

The worst thing is you babbling non-stop. (And among other things mentioning a million times “a million times”.) Hoooly.... shit...

To be Frank, I would primarily expect a woman (above 30) to do that. They have gross tastes, in some ways, especially as regards “bodily” matters, which they would see a s a “closer” or more “natural” or (that’s a good one) “unafraid” relationship to it, and that kind of thing... I think.

Let me just mention that the story is an absolute mess. For one, I don’t care to do anything - or what for. Then, they tried too hard to be “realistic”, or not over-the-top, and beat down on the protagonist in the beginning, making him feel pathetic (and old) and his development random.

This was badly managed, normally someone would have just interrupted him or told him to ask his question. Easy as pie. Truly a baffling incident.

Butts.

I have mentioned it before, and I am going to randomly mention it again: I am sick of Luke Plunkett’s “Keanu Reeves as Victorian woman”-portrait or whatever it is. Absolutely sick of it. It is not funny, it wasn’t what feels like three years ago, and if it is himself (so what, the features aren’t that clear), it

That’s a pretty ordinary reply, while I’m formally on “your” side, it’s annoying and devious that one regularly gets pressured into bashing on quotes here that sound pretty ordinary, without an explanation of what’s so phenomenally bad about it. It’s manipulative bullshit, ordinary mobbing, bullying and ”trolling”,

I don’t think so, I think she is like a more humanistic, enlightened version of what is normally annoying, no less nowadays, in brutish, narcissistic, unhinged “troll”-personalities (also sycophantic, manipulative female online users, if the more abstract “brutish” gives you one-sided ideas).

Slime and toxicity in one, here it comes... The ultimate, the enemy number 1, hiding in plain sight. Sending out waves of smugness and patronizing “superiority” that assume to be sociable, and tear back down any standard and “revalation” to its lowest, most trivial level. (Making anyone shrug and think “what was that

No you goddamn cannot. Unfortunately that showing off is necessary, in this hell-shrine, in the immorally designed hell-challenge, however the author could still provide a simple button combo or something, because it almpost seems like a hack (unknown everywhere), making the casual showing off dickish.

Shield jump? Care to mention what the f— this is? Jump mechanics are imprecise enough without someone casually mentioning and sitting on some impossibly unique technique that no-one in the world knows (and is probably hellishly awkward to pull off). No thanks for nothing.

As a statement in an argument or conversation, without any other context or argument (I’m literally just talking about the statement itself), it is a valid statement. It is worth pointing that out, while also keeping in mind that a statement doesn’t mean an ultimate conviction or necessarily final and universal

TL;DR: He thought the American Blockbuster “Young Girl and Zombies”-genre was a bit stale and predictable.

I bet you bent that story in your head to make it fit. In no way does the story even imply anything of that nature in that proportion (e.g. quasi-systematic, predatory “sexual harassment”). You’re a little vulture, a random, typical internet commenter, for that matter, so clichéd and simplistic that it gives one

Aye, basically conservatives who like to present themselves as the guardians of society and decency (okay, frankly, not even that anymore... Let’s just stay with the name “conservatives” then) are the ones who most shamelessly and wilfully indulge in what is also traditionally called sophistry, with a juvenile or

That’s not what counts as an insult by common standards. I agree with what it is, of course. However what an insult is and how it works is a tricky and somewhat superstitious matter. (E.g. some would allow and support this, and smirk about it, but be shocked and aghast, but not without a feeling of supreme triumph, if

Nobody said he was a good filmmaker or script-writer. Missed the memo? I mean, yes, of course, he is the independent film genius who is honoured here, in this corny (self-important) dedication to his weird-ass-ness.

It was a dedication in his favour of course, and if this is a fault, of the movie or actor, this is also one on the side of the honouring (you petty smart-ass [I don’t even like the movie, I don’t like typical internet comments either]).

Weeeell, James Franco won the aware for this “heartwarming story of friendship”, as it were. It doesn’t make sense to be so uptight in that moment, and not have a little bit of a sense of humour... It’s straightforward bad manners, as he did it (also, as indicated, of course your point would have mattered little, i.e.