macetheace002
matt_h
macetheace002

She complained about some things quite pointlessly (her aunt, even the Vale - who cares; actually good for her in both cases, in the show at least also in the Battle of the Bastards).

The dialogue is actually highly selective and not real by a long shot.

I think not moving one’s arms can be effective at short sprints at maximum effectiveness and minimum energy expense - and when in fact it would likely look far more weird to pump one’s arms and run in high-energy mode. E.g. running a part of the way to the bus, and maybe when one is also wearing a backpack.

What this really means is that we finally have the power of the N64 within our grasp. But of course we are fooled again by this render trailer (impressive on its own terms), and it might end up looking quite clunky. But I have to say I’m really excited for this announcement for now.

Impressive, but thinking about why again I should actually care about this being Star Wars has made it all seem like a farce. This being a similar phenomenon to the resurgence of (frankly pathetic) 90s superhero cartoons, just confirms the point. Of course this is just a juvenile fantasy of something very, very old by

We know the Japanese can do sentimentality. But frankly, I think this is taking too much weight by now in their view back on WW2.

At least these dumbass viewers of his get the message, even if it really confuses their scrambled eggs.

What the hell is this shit, and why is it allowed to go up? This is the gawker network, isn’t it, so have the owners have gone insane and decided it needs a lunatic Breitbart alternative, just to freshen things up at this most appropriate of times? Why is this not news itself? It is utterly deranged, as this

It wasn’t super-hard, it was pretty normal I think. In fact, I would never play that hardcore-sh** of the new 2D Raymans, for comparison. The demos just put me off, others love it. I even prefer Dark Souls, a bit. (Maybe it’s 10-15% better with a gamepad.) But Banjo Kazooie really was pretty normal - this for example

What a loser!! I think he died either an instant before or directly the instant after the cutscene started - or he would have died either way. Repeat: What a loser, OMG!!!

“Sensible Rational Logicman Objectivelord”. Wow, you say this in response to the above comment, but talking about the other guy. (And as if this were only obvious [rational, objective etc.]). Glorious. People on the internet are glorious.

Mod.

I think it was pretty - in some aspects very - bad, but if one disregards logic and has low expectations about conclusions and revelations, those were some effectively dramatic episodes.

Yes, I can see how that works regarding old games. It’s good that there is an analysis of it. And it’s more commonly and trivially known in modding. Of course the look and feeling is not retained in a lot of cases.

Something I could never stand are people only talking in clichés or empty phrases about others (chief among them the misappropriation of “trolls”) and blindly, pathetically overprotective people who think they are somehow less dramatic, less entitled, dependent or more practical-minded. (And anyone who can’t get a

It’s pretty simple. He’s not taking a vacation after a lot of great output (most of it was on-the-spot-stuff, e.g. streaming, talking freely), but after over a year of complaints to improve some areas of his output, which he didn’t follow up on or much care for, he is now taking a vacation to improve it.

I love it when someone can just call someone an asshole... I’m serious! Either it is deserved (and you are the issue, so just stop) - or what is your fucking issue, champ? (I’d say. This makes problems much easier - imagine being all prissy about it, without caring for the background or moral implications [trivial

I have had harassing exchanges on here (2012-2013, thereabouts) as well as somewhere else (far, far worse for my life), + never mind some minor pettiness etc. The problem is, nowadays there is a clichéd idea of it, I think. The toxicity and harassment I had to content with was strongly laced with narcissism, posing

Urgh, first it sounds like such a valuable topic, then it turns merely into internet clichés about “whiny” and being “mad”, by and for others (and their immoral, irrational confusion, hypocritical entertainmant and plain, disrespectful pettiness [keep that in check, thanks]) . Pretty bad stuff, ultimately. The What to

And attractive character designs - while they don’t have to be a rule - are just a staple. No less of a (“juvenile”) game like this.