lumiere
lumiere
lumiere

Eyes?

Won't disagree with you there, fully. But even though you pay a ton, something around 80% go into malpractice insurance. So in the end, maybe it's still the patients at fault.

I'd rather a doctor with a decade of school under his belt get 6 figures than people getting 8 figures being on a team or on screen.

Companies are greedy because you have to pay $5k so a bunch of people can keep you alive, while giving you new legs? What?

While there are parts of Obamacare I don't like, stuff like highlights exactly why it was created. This girl, if she doesn't have insurance, would have to pay $150k on top of hospital fees just for someone else's fault. Not a good situation to be in at merely 20.

The story says she's 20.

And $5000 is probably your deductible. So if your bill was $10k or $100k, you would have been responsible for the same $5k. Which brings me back to my original question

Fatal Frame 1 and 2 are $4 MSRP. It's that price on PSN as well. It was on sale during Halloween for $2 each though.

Just curious, but does she not have insurance?

*prison

While interesting, most of the books I mentioned weren't published until after your book. Although, Stephen Colbert could probably write a very detailed one.

We have a nice Chinese set that's $100-150 without Nintendo's name attached to it. I got it from my sister -at cost-, and it was still $65. You have to remember, it's 144 tiles. At $1 a tile, then add in the box, the point sticks, direction marker, and Nintendo's branding, it's not actually that ridiculous.

The trees are the two trees of Valinor. The lights from these trees were partially crafted into the Silmarilli, which is where the name Silmarillion comes from.

The first day I saw it, everyone was already saying it's fake. I'm not sure who was believing it to be real.

Avoid the cheap stuff, mostly. So pretty much nothing they sell in Walmart and Target.

BTW, that's not the acute accent mark. It's the grave accent mark.

Altavista was awesome back before Google. No reason to be ashamed anyways.

It doesn't change the fact that dry kibble is still the worst choice for them. I don't read random blogs like you apparently do. I read research results. There's plenty of research that say dry cat food doesn't promote teeth health any more than raw food. There's plenty of research showing cats getting diseases like

For the record, we feed our cats Nature's Variety Instinct (raw) chicken or duck + Wellness Selects (canned) + Evo (dry). We tried to feed them Wellness Core (dry), but they didn't like it at all.

The person you replied to only mentioned dry kibble. And every attempt to ask you to elaborate ended with no new info. Learn to communicate.