Flow limitations of the turbocharger will do that. STI has a bigger, higher CFM turbo.

A Subaru's rattles are 40% character.

Gear ratios.

A perfect drift is 15% talent and 84% DCCD, 1% snow.

Acceleration perception is 40% sound.

Does it really have more meat though?

I don't work at a plant but I've been to one. Anyway, it is unprofitable for Toyota to remove automation in the short term but if it develops its workers, it is an investment in the long term.

Why? It makes no difference if it's automated or hand made. If a part meets the tolerances on the engineering drawing, it is used and if it doesn't, the part is scrapped.

That's not how Toyota plants work. If you work on the line at a Toyota plant, you don't do the same task over and over. You do a variety of tasks to develop your skills and improve ergonomics. The idea is that people are smart enough to look at a situation and decide for themselves if a given process is optimal while…

50 ms? I doubt it.

But it shifts between 150 and 200 ms...

Have you driven an LFA?

Or not at all

It's tricky with the Ecoboost for fuel economy. Basically what happens is the engine starts to get too hot because of the boost and the injectors just dump fuel into the combustion chamber to cool it down. It runs so rich and it's worse when load is high and it's hot; much worse than V8 F150s.

1000 PS which equals ~986 HP.

I'd say closer to the Elise side of the range. It's really low. You definitely have to drop yourself in but the seat is also far away from the entryway since there's a lot of door sill. It's also sort of a reclined position so it's quite difficult trying to put your feet in the footwell, climbing in, and plomping down…

It wasn't easy to get in because it has wide sills and it's low. I'm 6'2" and had some difficulty sliding in easily.

I don't expect it either. Most definitely because of emissions.

But a 300 HP FA20 exists already in the Legacy STI.

Just sitting in the car is amazing.