Ever use the term deadline? How about grandfathering something in? Or maybe ‘drink the Kool-aid’? No? You’re good.

I would agree with this except, according to the author of this shitpiece, you’re saying the clean energy is about bombing Japanese. Why do you hate Japanese?

Being deliberately obtuse is not sexy. “Manhattan project” = urgent call for best and brightest to find solution to threat.

Why? For the folks who vote (read: olds) it’s the perfect analogy.

Can you encrypt your caps lock key? Please?

For center right Americans, it most certainly is an analogy you want to use.

sphincter says what?

I’m no debatin’ espert, but I suspect her use of that term was slightly more akin to saying, “We need to get our best and brightest working on a major threat.” rather than, “We need to get a bunch of people to drop bombs on Japan.”

You’re wrong.

You wrote words.

Arms? To show off baseball players’ arms, you mean. Risque stuff. You’re comparing that to a woman in a leotard/bathing suit and heels with her legs draped open.

No. But that’s the whitest blogpost headline ever.

I haven’t read this and I don’t care. I just really like the faux, distressed Rolling Rock hat. It’s meta.

Hm. Lemme see... One is a photo of two men standing in a normal position in a outfits that were in no way sexual back in their times. The other is a photo of a woman wearing a bathing suit/dancing onsie and high heels with her legs spread wide open as she drapes herself over a chair. If you don’t think the latter is…

That’s the body issue, Einstein. Not the Sportsperson of the Year Issue, Newton. Get it together, Hawking.

I said sexualizing. Nothing sexual about those two steroid mongers in that pose or get-up.

Ay look, the guy’s not wrong. It’s sexualizing a woman in a way that they wouldn’t do to a dude. But fuck it. If she wanted it, I’m good.

Yep. He got the ‘vacation’ he paid for.

The d-bags? Odd choice.

Eh? I didn’t write the first thing. But I did compliment the person who did. So, um, yeah.