Legit question - can you be charged with a crime in Great Britain for what he said??

Yes, not judging someone based solely on probably biased allegations is misogyny; good job trying to make that word meaningless, therefore making it easier for ACTUAL misogyny to flourish.

I’m no Bill Murray apologist, and I think it’s probably more likely than not that there is at least some truth to the accusations (if not that they’re entirely true) . . . but there is a big contextual difference between allegations only made (and later withdrawn) in the midst of a contentious divorce, and say, the…

Yes it’s a real asshole move that he is able to pick the projects he wants to be a part of.

Things said in divorce proceedings are rarely unbiased fact. It’s pretty common for aggrieved spouses to exaggerate or invent abuses in order to structure more advantageous settlements. I’m not saying Bill was a joy to live with-he was probably a huge pain in the ass- but surely that didn’t take Jennifer by surprise…

Are we supposed to just ignore the fact that she suddenly started looking like the Madame toussaud on crack version of herself?

What makes me saddest is that the majority of the hate directed towards pregnant women comes from other women. The level of scrutiny is fucking astounding. Unless you’re doing drugs, drinking excessively, or otherwise endangering your fetus, then I think you should be able to do whatever the hell you want without…

Ummmm no. If rape is wrong, then it’s wrong. Even suggesting rape as a punishment is gross.

Deen told Snow he is “baffled” by the accusations, adding, “All of the accusations are from either ex-girlfriends or events that happened on set.”

I viscerally dislike U2 for a number of reasons, but I have to respect them on this. EoDM wanted to come back, and I’m glad they did. If you haven’t, oh you ephemeral Kinja commenter, watch the Vice interview with Jesse Hughes and Josh Homme, you really should.

Haha, I’m just kind of laughing to myself, because you realize that if you’re an atheist, then you don’t believe in the devil and you’re not scared of “messing with [him]” and you’re not scared of hell or an after life that includes heaven and hell. Like, if you don’t believe that something is real, then it can’t hurt…

They do not worship Satan. They do not worship Lucifer. They do not worship themselves. They do not worship. These folks are not the shadowy cabal of Crowleyesque mystics you are imagining.

Isn’t the invocation of a supernatural entity specifically so they can argue their religion’s equal rights under the law (e.g. statues of Beelzebub having equal standing as Ten Commandments sculptures?)

There is no Satan. No Lucifer. They're inventions.

Here’s an actual concern I have as an athiest: I have no inherent protection of my sincerely held beliefs from the constitution. These “satanists” are the only people going to the government with values that reflect my opinions. I have seriously thought about aligning with some humanist religion for this reason after…

In general, the members of the Satanic Temple are not satanists and do not worship lucifer. They're mostly Athiests who are trying to make a point about Christianity bleeding into government.

Meh. The world has already welcomed millions of babies named variations of Jesus and Kristof without serious impact. Then there’s prophets, which are practically too numerous to count: Mohammad, Idris, Aaron, Abraham, David, Isaiah, Jacob, Joshua, John, Nathan, etc etc...

Not actually what happened. After the procedure, the man psychologically rejected it and doctors removed it. No gangrene involved.

Absent from the speech: “we will cut all financial and commercial links to Saudi Arabia.”

I’m a black french muslim woman living in France and I don’t think it’s a good idea until the sister cuts off her contacts to the hardline islamist groups she is engaging with (Jamaat-e-Islami).